Profane Holiness: Why the New Atheism Is (Partially) Good for True Spirituality and Religion

By White, Thomas | Cross Currents, December 2009 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Profane Holiness: Why the New Atheism Is (Partially) Good for True Spirituality and Religion


White, Thomas, Cross Currents


  I believe; help my unbelief!
                  --Mark 9:24

The New Atheists (TNAs) have seized the public's imagination, opening a new front in the American Cultural Wars against the Religious Right. But if we look closer we can see the wisdom of Simone Weil's powerful observation that atheism is a "purification of the notion of God." Let's call it Profane Holiness.

Conventional True Believers who chop the broad landscape of spirituality into fixed, little denominational plots, ringed with sectarian No Trespass signs, lead us to wrong turns and up cul-de-sacs. This is why the New Atheism should be celebrated, not scorned. It is a kind of Neo-Socratic midwifery, which, contrary to its own explicit intentions, frees true religious-spiritual energy from the old divisions, prejudices, and cliches of the past. Religion is then open to be returned to its original subversive and dynamic, not static, role. The New Atheism ironically offers a kind of cleansing--a tacit (though unintentional) defense, as well as enabler, of the religious life and mind. Of course, its avowed goal is the expose of Spirituality and Religion as the Great Delusions of History, but paradoxically the result is the opposite.

This essay could also be subtitled an "unbeliever's defense" because sectarian colorations of faith often conceal more than they reveal. Those attached to sects and particular doctrines, ironically are unreliable as defenders and explorers of the spiritual. This does not mean that every sectarian speaks only spiritual falsehoods; it only means that the spiritual truth is far broader than this or that particular religious doctrine or sect. As war is too important to be left to generals so spiritual journeys are too important to be left to the piously faithful. Non-sectarian unbelievers have their powerful uses: those who have a spiritual hunger unsatisfied by sectarian offerings may yet find--contrary to the conventional wisdom--that the unfaithful are their most reliable guide. The Hindu maxim that truth/God is one, though the sages call it by many names, has to include non-believers too.

I

Aldous Huxley spoke of the human "fear of labyrinthine flux and perplexity of phenomena ..." And complexity is not a message, Huxley noted, for the smug, well-heeled, wealthy, or complacent who variably want to "settle down in their snug metaphysical villa[s] and go to sleep." They want a comfortable, facile, one-dimensional world, which is precisely what the original founders of religion did not offer. Instead, Buddha, Muhammad, and Christ, after their own fashion, were restless, subversive, quasi-Socratic figures pushing humanity toward an uncomfortable confrontation with a turbulent, perplexing reality. And just as Socrates challenged the Athenian pantheon of morally unseemly Olympian gods, so the founders of the three major religions challenged their respective era's corrupt religious, social, and communal conventions and traditions.

Religion, in its robust, original sense, was no opiate for the people (though that might apply to the deracinated version peddled the last twenty years by the American Right, whose "God" resembles more the bogus gods of ancient Rome designed to bless the status quo's power center). Rather in its "pure" dynamic sense it shocked, and thereby centered the soul and mind on upsetting, wrenching concerns and questions regarding guilt, responsibility, God, death, the world, and the existence of evil. TNAs (who undeniably have their own sectarian unquestioned faith in the non-existence of God) reprise this quasi-Socratic role, forcing the conventionally religious to feel uncomfortable inside their cozy, metaphysical villas by facing the perplexity of existence.

John Shelby Spong has celebrated a new emerging Christianity in opposition to tired institutional creeds and symbols "that must be broken open so that the concept of God can be embraced by new possibilities.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Profane Holiness: Why the New Atheism Is (Partially) Good for True Spirituality and Religion
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?