Constitutional Law - Equal Protection - New York Court of Appeals Holds That State May Restrict Legal Alien Access to Disability Benefits

Harvard Law Review, January 2010 | Go to article overview

Constitutional Law - Equal Protection - New York Court of Appeals Holds That State May Restrict Legal Alien Access to Disability Benefits


CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--EQUAL PROTECTION--NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS HOLDS THAT STATE MAY RESTRICT LEGAL ALIEN ACCESS TO DISABILITY BENEFITS.--Khrapunskiy v. Doar, 909 N.E.2d 70 (N.Y. 2009).

Over the past decade, several states have responded to tightened budgets by proposing measures that restrict legal immigrants' access to public benefits. (1) In defending the constitutionality of such measures, states have cited Title IV of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (2) (PRWORA). (3) Title IV restricts legal alien access to a variety of federal benefits (4) but leaves states free to set their own eligibility criteria. (5) The statute's open-ended delegation to states has created a vexing constitutional problem for courts by testing the limits of the prevailing two-track system of judicial review for state and federal alienage measures. (6) Recently, in Khrapunskiy v. Doar, (7) the New York Court of Appeals sidestepped this doctrinal uncertainty by refusing to apply equal protection analysis to the New York State legislature's decision to restrict alien access to state disability payments. (8) The court's evasion was constitutionally unjustified. The court should have reached an equal protection analysis and applied strict scrutiny to the restrictive state alienage measure. This approach likely would have changed the outcome of the case. (9)

In response to the creation of the federal Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program in 1974, (10) New York replaced its existing program of disability benefits with a new state-funded supplement, Additional State Payments for Eligible Aged, Blind and Disabled Persons (11) (ASP). Though ASP was initially extended to both U.S. citizens and lawful aliens, (12) the New York legislature amended the program's eligibility requirements in 1998 (13) to exclude legal aliens rendered ineligible for SSI by Title IV. Lead plaintiff Boris Khrapunskiy was one of several indigent, elderly refugees who failed to obtain citizenship within seven years of arrival and whose SSI and ASP benefits were terminated as a result. (14) These refugees and other ineligible legal immigrants sued as a class, (15) arguing that the state's restrictions on alien access to ASP violated the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution, as well as provisions of the New York State Constitution. (16)

Judge Solomon of the Supreme Court of New York County invalidated the legislative amendment on state constitutional and equal protection grounds. (17) In upholding plaintiffs' equal protection challenge, Judge Solomon cited Graham v. Richardson, (18) which held that state classifications based on alienage are "inherently suspect and subject to close judicial scrutiny" (19) because aliens are a "prime example of a 'discrete and insular' minority." (20) The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court affirmed, rejecting the State's contention that a lesser standard of review should apply because New York was merely following a "uniform immigration rule" (21) articulated by Congress in PRWORA. (22) The court found that New York was not compelled by federal mandate to change ASP eligibility criteria but rather freely "cho[se] its own policy with respect to ... benefits for resident, indigent legal aliens." (23) Hence, New York could not benefit from the rational basis standard of review accorded to federal alienage classifications. (24)

The Court of Appeals reversed. (25) Writing for the majority, Judge Jones held that "[i]n conforming the New York statute to mirror the federal law, the State did not create a classification drawn along suspect lines." (26) Rather than proceed with an equal protection analysis, however, the court held that such an analysis was unnecessary, because ASP is not a "state program of aid." (27) The court observed that public assistance to the indigent elderly, blind, and disabled underwent a "federal takeover" in 1974 (28) and that ASP was created simply because "Congress required the states to provide a mandatory minimum supplement" (29) to SSI, subject to penalties to a state's Medicaid funding.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Constitutional Law - Equal Protection - New York Court of Appeals Holds That State May Restrict Legal Alien Access to Disability Benefits
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.