Prize for Most Blatant Interference in the Judicial Process Goes to ... UK Minister

Cape Times (South Africa), February 18, 2010 | Go to article overview

Prize for Most Blatant Interference in the Judicial Process Goes to ... UK Minister


BYLINE: Carmel Rickard

MOVE over John Hlophe; you've more than met your match.

I thought claims that Judge President Hlophe had tried to influence the outcome of a Constitutional Court decision were illustrative of the last word in legal cheek. But I was wrong.

That contest has to go to British Foreign Secretary, David Miliband, who with his counsel, leading barrister Jonathan Sumption QC, has shocked that country's legal and political community.

Sumption is held in awe by colleagues, who say he has "a brain the size of a planet". He's also said to be one of the few barristers who can influence a case simply by his presence in court.

Now, however, it turns out he can also influence decisions without even being in court.

Sumption is appearing for Miliband in a protracted series of cases concerning an Ethiopian-born Briton, Binyam Mohamed, held on suspicion of terrorism by the US for six years. Since his release without charge by the US and return to England last year, he has tried to prove he was tortured and that British MI5 was involved in it.

As evidence of his torture and MI5 collusion has emerged, Miliband and the security establishment have desperately tried to co-opt the courts in attempts at a cover-up.

Things appeared to have reached a climax last week. The government had tried to keep seven paragraphs about Mohamed's torture out of a High Court judgment, citing security concerns, but three senior judges of the Court of Appeal dismissed the government's argument that secrecy should prevail. They found no reason why the information, confirming sleep deprivation and other torture methods, should not be included in the judgment text.

The nature of his "treatment" was already in the public domain, they ruled, following publication of a decision by a US judge who bluntly said Mohamed was "tortured".

She found he was beaten with a leather strap; subjected to a mock execution by shooting; beaten, punched and kicked to the extent that he vomited and urinated; and tied to a wall and left hanging in darkness listening to other prisoners screaming. For more than a year, and about once a month, he was cut on his chest, penis and testicles with a scalpel.

After this was published, why censor a British judgment on the same subject?

But just at this turning point it was discovered that the appeal court decision had itself been targeted: the government had secretly tried to edit this judgment as well. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Prize for Most Blatant Interference in the Judicial Process Goes to ... UK Minister
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.