Modeling Remote Sensing Satellite Collection Opportunity Likelihood for Hurricane Disaster Response

By Hodgson, Michael E.; Davis, Bruce A. et al. | Cartography and Geographic Information Science, January 2010 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Modeling Remote Sensing Satellite Collection Opportunity Likelihood for Hurricane Disaster Response


Hodgson, Michael E., Davis, Bruce A., Cheng, Yang, Miller, James, Cartography and Geographic Information Science


Introduction

The natural disaster paradigm is often portrayed as a cycle--from the warning stage as the event approaches, the event followed by the response stage, subsequent recovery, and then a relatively more leisurely planning and mitigation stage. Considerable GIScience research has been conducted for the warning, recovery, or mitigation stages. A highly "visible" yet poorly understood or researched problem is the use of remotely sensed imagery during the short response stage. The emergency response stage for most natural disasters is very short. State and local agencies involved in emergency response to natural disasters such as hurricanes have explicitly indicated they need imagery covering the disaster area within three days of the event; and more desirably within 24 hours of the event (Hodgson et al. 2010). During the post-event disaster response remotely sensed derived damage information becomes less important as time passes and in situ data (deemed more accurate) becomes available (Hodgson et al. 2010). Airborne image collections have often been used but suffer from several problems, most noticeably the long collection time required for larger areas. The use of remote sensing satellites carrying high spatial resolution sensors has often been touted (Visser and Dawood 2004; Zhang and Kerle 2008) as the logical response for rapidly collecting post-disaster event imagery for emergency response. While more coarse resolution satellite sensors may provide some information that is useful in emergency response, agencies typically desire high spatial resolution (e.g., 1 m or less) to assess structural and transportation feature damages. Thus, this article focused on the use of satellite imaging opportunities with high spatial resolution sensors on the order of 1.5 x 1.5 m or less.

Satellite image coverage area within a swath (e.g., > 8 km width by an infinite length) is much larger than the footprint of airborne (except the U-2 high altitude aircraft) imaging sensors. Collection times for most remote sensing satellites are -7.5 km/sec, allowing for impact areas to be imaged in a few seconds. The downlink and initial post-processing by satellite image providers can be within a few hours, compared to six to eight hours (or much longer for post-processing and geometric rectification) for airborne imagery collection, processing, and transmittal.

Unfortunately, satellites are maintained on fixed orbits. The repeat interval for remote sensing satellites carrying high spatial resolution sensors, even with pointable sensors, is on the order of several days, depending on the latitude of the area of interest. It may be that the next available overpass is two or more days after the disaster event. Fortunately, more than one operational satellite carries high spatial resolution imagery. The availability of multiple collection platforms may provide the appropriate set of opportunities to collect imagery over disasters at any time. However, these satellites are still on fixed orbits. No known study has examined the collection opportunities provided by high spatial resolution satellites for disaster response. The problem is not simple. Such satellites carrying high spatial resolution satellites are not on systematic repetitive tracks whereby future passes can be made from path-row maps, such as Landsat or SPOT. The pointable (off-nadir in particular) sensor systems onboard many earth resources satellites today offer somewhat flexible collection opportunities. Prediction of future collection opportunities would require modeling satellite orbital trajectories and somehow incorporating unsystematic maneuvers where the satellites are repositioned. Furthermore, the observational record of many high-impact but low-frequency events, such as hurricanes and earthquakes, is weakly suited to developing well fitted spatial/temporal probability functions for predicting future occurrences.

The goal of this research was to develop a generic approach for empirically assessing the likelihood of collecting satellite imagery given a spatial/temporal distribution of disaster locations.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Modeling Remote Sensing Satellite Collection Opportunity Likelihood for Hurricane Disaster Response
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?