Using Building Permits to Monitor Disaster Recovery: A Spatio-Temporal Case Study of Coastal Mississippi Following Hurricane Katrina

By Stevenson, Joanne R.; Emrich, Christopher T. et al. | Cartography and Geographic Information Science, January 2010 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Using Building Permits to Monitor Disaster Recovery: A Spatio-Temporal Case Study of Coastal Mississippi Following Hurricane Katrina

Stevenson, Joanne R., Emrich, Christopher T., Mitchell, Jerry T., Cutter, Susan L., Cartography and Geographic Information Science


Recovery from a natural disaster is understood as a dynamic and multifaceted process, yet we know little about its spatial and temporal variability. The inability of most methods to provide information about the pace and progression of disaster recovery leads to the problematic conclusion that recovery is spatially uniform and consistent from one time period to another (Cutter et al. 2006; Zottarelli 2008).

Hurricane Katrina stands as the most damaging disaster in U.S. history. One model suggests that long-term recovery of the Gulf Coast could take 11 years (Kates et al. 2006). Within that time, several billion dollars of aid and countless hours will be spent rebuilding the damaged structures and impacted institutions. While many studies following Hurricane Katrina have revealed initial recovery disparities driven by class and gender (Cutter et al. 2006; Elliott and Pais 2006), few methods or metrics are capable of capturing trends of recovery throughout the entire impacted area and over longer time frames (Pais and Elliott 2008; Zottarelli 2008). A disaster of this magnitude affords an opportunity to study how long-term recovery is manifested within an affected landscape and to uncover the drivers of recovery as they shift through space and time.

In this paper we use a spatial scan statistic, SaTScan, to examine the space-time trends of built environment recovery following Hurricane Katrina. Scan statistics are a common tool used to determine if points (in this case, rebuilding activities) are randomly distributed in space and time or if they are clustered (Kulldorff 1997; Kulldorff 2005). This research specifically investigates the spatial and temporal patterns of recovery using building permits issued in three municipalities on Mississippi's Gulf Coast. The spatio-temporal relationships between permits issued, damage level, and the pre-event number of housing units in the affected area form the basis for this inquiry. We question whether spatial and temporal clusters of building permits, if they exist, are related to the level of damage caused by the storm or the density of pre-event housing. The techniques employed here improve our understanding of recovery with data and methods which highlight recovery as a process rather than as an outcome.

What is Recovery?

Defining what recovery is and what it means for affected communities is fundamental to finding appropriate ways to measure it. Recovery varies depending on the context of the disaster, the level of impact and the extent of the damage, and the pre-event conditions (Bates and Peacock 1989; Quarantelli 1999). In addition to physical destruction and disruption, disasters interrupt the highly connected social fabric of communities (Bolin 1976). While some of the literature addresses recovery as a multi-dimensional concept from a theoretical perspective, most case studies of recovery distill a single aspect of the recovery process for in-depth analysis, focusing on specific recovery topics such psycho-social (Gault et al. 2005), institutional (Rubin and Barbee 1985), economic and business (Chang 2000; Webb et al. 2002), built environment (Liu and Plyer 2009; McCarthy and Hanson 2008), or the natural environment (Orr and Ogden 1992).

Oftentimes, the term recovery has been used interchangeably with rebuilding, restoration, and redevelopment (Mileti 1999). These phases are instrumental to recovery. For example, rebuilding of residential, commercial, and public structures not only requires the largest amount of resources, but is also an important precursor to repopulation, and the reestablishment of commerce and social networks (Rubin et al 1985; Kamel and LoukaitouSideris 2004). It must be acknowledged, however, that these other indicators are inadequate when trying to generalize about community recovery as a process, one that strives to restore, rebuild, and reshape the physical infrastructure, natural environment, and socio-economic systems through pre-event planning and post-event actions (Smith and Wenger 2006).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Using Building Permits to Monitor Disaster Recovery: A Spatio-Temporal Case Study of Coastal Mississippi Following Hurricane Katrina


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?