Health Care Confidentiality: Current Virginia Law and a Proposal for Legislation

By Lombardo, Paul | Developments in Mental Health Law, June-December 1995 | Go to article overview

Health Care Confidentiality: Current Virginia Law and a Proposal for Legislation


Lombardo, Paul, Developments in Mental Health Law


   What I may see or hear in the course of the treatment or even
   outside of the treatment in regard to the life of men, which on
   no account one must spread abroad, I will keep to myself
   holding such things shameful to be spoken about. (1)

This is Hippocrates' ancient prescription for medical confidentiality. Once presumed only for physicians, the rule of confidentiality is now a universal ethical requirement for those who work in health care settings, including psychologists, social workers and others who provide mental health services. The ethical norm for practitioners is matched by an expectation on the part of patients who yield the secrets not only of their bodies, but of their minds, in an effort to achieve health.

Some have argued that developing practice trends give too many people access to a patient's records. As a result, the foundation of trust characteristic of the doctor/patient relationship has eroded, they say, and the ethic of shared secrets is threatened. (2) Additionally, the new technologies that require computerized medical records and convenient electronic data transmission have made the protection of clinical information difficult. Legal practice has also evolved, and demands for medical evidence in all types of litigation--from personal injury, to employment actions to child custody--have become commonplace.

Certain kinds of medical innovations have led to proposals for new laws. For example, the availability of previously unknowable genetic information set the stage for the development of a model genetic privacy act, (3) and general concerns over the possibilities for abuse of electronic medical records have yielded calls for a comprehensive national law to regulate medical confidentiality. A bill that would accomplish that goal has recently been introduced in Congress. (4) In the judicial arena, the importance of mental health confidentiality is coming into focus as the United States Supreme Court reviews the application of the psychotherapeutic privilege to actions in federal courts. (5)

Meanwhile, though some federal statutes provide extraordinary protection for certain kinds of records, (6) and occasional exceptions that supersede state prohibitions on disclosure, (7) medical confidentiality is generally a creature of state law.

Virginia Confidentiality Law

Virginia's law relating to confidential medical or mental health information is contained in a patchwork of statutes that are difficult to find and more difficult to understand and apply. Taken together, those laws neither instruct the subject of sensitive information when his or her expectation of confidentiality will be respected, nor clearly alert the professional when a disclosure of confidential information is appropriate. Ironically, while there are as many as fifteen different statutes that allow or require doctors and psychotherapists to breach patient confidentiality, there is no statute in Virginia that specifically requires confidentiality to be maintained in both public and private therapeutic contexts. (See Table 1.)

There are, however, several statutes that protect some features of medical and mental health confidentiality. A statute on the "Rights of Patients and Residents" of facilities operated, funded or licensed by the Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services promises "legal rights and care consistent with basic human dignity." A specific provision of the statute allows a facility resident to "[h]ave access to his medical and mental records and be assured of their confidentiality...." (8)

Another statute settles the ownership of medical records in health care providers while simultaneously mandating that "providers shall keep medical records confidential and only authorized personnel shall have access to such records." (9)

The only other broad legal protection of confidential information is provided by a privilege against compelled disclosure in the litigation context. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Health Care Confidentiality: Current Virginia Law and a Proposal for Legislation
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.