Academic Freedom: A Right Worth Protecting

By Galambos, Colleen M. | Journal of Social Work Education, Winter 2010 | Go to article overview

Academic Freedom: A Right Worth Protecting

Galambos, Colleen M., Journal of Social Work Education

Academic freedom refers to a civil right of academicians to engage in research, teaching, and scholarly production free from control or restraint from their college and university employers (Columbia University Press, 2009). Connected to the right of tenure of office, the philosophical premise of academic freedom is the open investigation of data in search of objective facts and to engage in the inquiry process, apart from personal considerations.

An ideal that originated during the Enlightenment period, academic freedom supported the scientific method of the development of hypotheses and the analysis of data in pursuit of the truth. Before academic freedom could be wholly embraced, the secularization of education was necessary (Columbia University Press, 2009). The concept flourished in the Progressive Era, and the formation of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP), along with the 1915 adoption of a Declaration of Principles on Academic Freedom and Academic Tenure, codified its principles (Calhoun, 2009; Scott, 2009).

These principles provided a model for university governance in which academic freedom was regarded as a moral obligation (AAUP, 1915). Progress was measured by the degree to which there was "complete and unlimited freedom to pursue inquiry and publish its results" (AAUP, 1915, p. 28). Critical thinking became the primary function of the university. In its purest form, the philosophy of academic freedom emphasizes both freedom in inquiry and freedom of learning in which students actively shape their own course of learning (Calhoun, 2009).

As early as 1902, John Dewey, who became president of AAUP, worried about the effects of money on the pursuit of knowledge, and he warned of the impact of the quest for money and funding on the educational mission of the university (Dewey, 2000). Others shared his concern, with recognition that the more a university is organized as a proprietary entity, the less it can be organized around the principles of academic freedom (Calhoun, 2009). Trustees or donors who demanded loyalty to a certain position, approach, or philosophy were always a threat. The withdrawal of funding or support if such positions were not honored was the presented risk at that time.

Some believed that the social sciences and humanities were particularly vulnerable because they were emerging disciplines at the time. It was recognized that because the social sciences examined the moral and social needs of society, their research was more likely to be both disturbing and transformative, and therefore needed academic freedom protection more than the mathematical and physical sciences. By its very nature, academic freedom was designed to protect academicians perceived to be the most radical, those immersed in social criticism and social reform movements (Scott, 2009).

Indeed, during the McCarthy era the social sciences were particularly under attack. During the 1950s Senator Joe McCarthy led a movement that resulted in the blacklisting and firing of identified dissident intellectuals. During this period faculty members were fired, and others, particularly junior faculty, censored themselves and disallowed political dissent in the classroom (Giroux, 2006).

Even though the McCarthy era was half a century ago, threats to academic freedom continue to emerge. There have been recent examples of external politics affecting university decision making. Attacks on professors and curricular content have occurred as a result of the Patriot Act and corporate fundamentalism (Giroux, 2006; Lukianoff, 2005). Academic leaders are particularly concerned because the attacks on higher education have moved beyond academic freedom and have expanded into the firing of dissenting professors, control of the hiring process, curricular content, and academic pedagogy. Cole (2005) points out that there is a growing effort for universities to monitor classroom discussion, create speech codes, and censor the expression of ideas that are found to be disagreeable. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Academic Freedom: A Right Worth Protecting


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.