The Winds of Change: The Two Priorities for the UK's Energy Policy Are Decarbonisation and Energy Security, but Are They Compatible?

By MacKerron, Gordon | New Statesman (1996), March 15, 2010 | Go to article overview

The Winds of Change: The Two Priorities for the UK's Energy Policy Are Decarbonisation and Energy Security, but Are They Compatible?


MacKerron, Gordon, New Statesman (1996)


To the casual reader, it would not have been particularly notable. But to anyone who follows energy policy closely, the decision by Gordon Brown in the foreword to a recent energy white paper to describe energy security as "imperative" and climate change as a "challenge" is a huge waving flag. Security has now, in political terms, overtaken climate change.

Energy security and climate change are seen as the Big Issues for Britain's energy policy. But are the threats to security as real as much political debate--and special pleading by various vested interests--would have us believe? In reality, those thinking about energy security worry about two, quite distinct possible problems--increased reliance on foreign suppliers of oil and gas (the "nasty foreigner" issue) and a possible electricity gap around 2015, with an apparent risk of the lights going out. While both things need to be watched, they are often overhyped.

The dominant fear about oil and gas imports is the idea that Russia will make political use of the clout given by its enormous gas reserves, coupled with the fact that the UK is at the end of the line. In practice, we get only 2 per cent of our gas from Russia and companies have built a number of liquefied natural gas terminals around the coast. In other words, we are managing the import problem (as are virtually all the other G8 countries). "Peak oil" is also exaggerated: oil supply adequacy is undoubtedly a long-term challenge, but no immediate threat.

The second security issue (the "gap") derives from the need to replace a large proportion of electricity-generating capacity, especially around 2015, when we will lose most of our nuclear power capacity and new sulphur/nitrogen limits will drastically reduce coal-fired capacity. The government's apparent complacency about this is not as unreasonable as it may look. The UK will continue to expand renewables, and the default option remains gas-fired power, which is quick and easy to build, with many projects in the pipeline. The "gap" will thus probably disappear without too much trouble. But if it does start to pose a risk, the UK will seek--and get--derogations or postponements from the rules about sulphur emissions, and simply run the coal-fired plants longer.

The real problem with filling the "gap" is its potential effect on the second main energy-policy challenge of carbon cuts. If the gap needs a great deal of fossil fuel to fill it--especially if new coal-fired capacity supplements gas--we will get locked in to high-carbon power when we badly need to decarbonise the electric power system. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Winds of Change: The Two Priorities for the UK's Energy Policy Are Decarbonisation and Energy Security, but Are They Compatible?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.