Too Good to Be True: The Remarkable Resilience of Microfinance

By Dlchter, Thomas W. | Harvard International Review, Spring 2010 | Go to article overview

Too Good to Be True: The Remarkable Resilience of Microfinance


Dlchter, Thomas W., Harvard International Review


When the concept of underdevelopment took shape in the middle of the last century, the search for the holy grail of poverty reduction began in earnest. And while many answers to the daunting challenge have been offered, none of the ideas put forth has had greater appeal or more endurance than microfinance. Yet no other longstanding idea about poverty reduction rests on as little empirical evidence of success.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

This is not to say that microfinance cannot work as a business concept. There are a number of microfinance institutions (MFIs) which make money {at least two, one in Mexico and one in India have even taken the initial public filing route) and a fair amount of what is now called microfinance is done under the aegis of commercial or other types of banking institutions, such as credit unions, which have been around for a long time. These kinds of MFIs are not subsidized by development-oriented public or private grants or soft loans. As such, they can go about what they do whether or not their claims to a greater good rest on a solid foundation or are merely good public relations.

But even given today's loose array of entities that call themselves MFIs--ads in the Paris Metro for consumer loans to the middle class refer to their loans as "microfinance"--at a minimum over half the funds committed to microfinance today are subsidized. Why should this be so? The only good reason to subsidize microfinance is if it has a demonstrable impact on poverty reduction or some other measurable social benefit that is otherwise unachievable. But it does not.

Microfinance's anti-poverty promise and its growing popularity are less a mystery if one looks at microfinance "memetically"--that is, as an idea which has spread contagiously, propelled in part because so many of its proponents want its promise of poverty reduction to be true, and indeed, need it to be true. The appeal of microfinance is remarkably broad, flawlessly magical, and has the added benefit of brevity--microfinance's anti-poverty promise can be stated in a couple of simple sentences: lend money to poor people who will invest in tiny businesses, and with their profits pay back the money and gradually rise out of poverty. And as more and more of such services are available, these ''micro-enterprises" will contribute to (and even drive) economic growth. The idea reaches the heart and the head (see below), the ideological left and the right, and contains an almost universally irresistible narrative: the poor can be agents of their own destiny if only they have a chance to access formal financial services, which, especially and for almost all of the history of microfinance, takes the form of microcredit.

I have argued elsewhere that perhaps one of the reasons explaining the serious lack of rigorous research on micro-finance's impact on poverty is that the idea was so strongly cherished that no one wanted to risk hearing that it might not work. For years the field took refuge in saying that what counts is high repayment rates (a proxy for success), or that the difficulties (and cost) of rigorous research were too daunting and in the end not worth it.

But in 2009, for essentially the first time, research based on rigorous randomized controlled trials showed that microfinance has no sustained effect on poverty reduction, much less economic growth. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Poverty Action Lab study in India as well as a study using randomized controlled trials in the Philippines by academics Dean Karlan and Jonathan Zin-man both found that microcredit did not reduce poverty. In addition, a recent study of four high microfinance growth countries (Bosnia-Herzegovina, Nicaragua, Morocco, and Pakistan) showed rising default and delinquency problems as well as a pattern of the poor borrowing from multiple sources. Moreover, many microfinance practitioners who work directly with clients on-the-ground have long noticed that the poorer the borrower, the more likely the borrower's economic activity is for the purpose of survival with little likelihood that activity will become a genuine and thriving business.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Too Good to Be True: The Remarkable Resilience of Microfinance
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.