It Won't Be the Newspapers Wot Won It; History Shows There Are Limits to the Press's Influence in Elections -- Even before Lib-Dems' Shock Rise in 2010; MEDIA ANALYSIS

The Evening Standard (London, England), May 5, 2010 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

It Won't Be the Newspapers Wot Won It; History Shows There Are Limits to the Press's Influence in Elections -- Even before Lib-Dems' Shock Rise in 2010; MEDIA ANALYSIS


Byline: Roy Greenslade

IN 1945, when the first post-war election was held, it was assumed by most of the press barons of that era that Winston Churchill would win. However, their newspapers were not exactly complacent during the campaign, pouring daily scorn on the "evil socialists" who dared to oppose the man hailed then, as now, as Britain's greatest prime minister.

As we all know, Labour won by a landslide.

Yet the winning party and its paymasters, the trade unions, were not content with having won in the face of newspaper hostility. They demanded, and got, a royal commission to inquire into press ownership and its political influence.

Given that the only non-print media of the time was BBC radio and television (then in its infancy), it may be unsurprising that people were convinced that the barons wielded all-conquering power. But Labour's 1945 election win should have given them pause for thought.

In every general election since, and there have been 16 more, the evidence that points to newspapers being the key instrument forging election victories has been anything but conclusive.

Far and away the best attempt to prove it was made in the wake of the 1992 election, in which John Major decisively beat Neil Kinnock, when a certain red-top boasted: "It was The Sun wot won it."

I don't think I am revealing any secret by saying that Rupert Murdoch was less than delighted with the claim and, after his phone call to the editor, the piece was discreetly moved in later editions from the front page to page two. Martin Linton, then a Guardian journalist and now, just about, Labour MP for Battersea, spent a year at Oxford University doing his level best to show that The Sun had indeed swung the election. His 1995 paper and lecture were very persuasive but, ultimately, his thesis was just as much open to doubt as less academic contentions by rival commentators.

In this millennium, with the media landscape having enlarged to such a degree, the idea that a few newspaper barons call the political tune seems hopelessly far-fetched.

Indeed, in this general election campaign, the papers -- and their owners and editors -- were blindsided by television.

The leaders' TV debates, particularly the first one, have set the agenda as never before.

No newspaper has managed in a single article to add 11 points to a party leader's poll rating, and seen it sustain for so long. Yet that's what happened to the Liberal Democrats' Nick Clegg after a 90-minute appearance.

No paper, not the Daily Mirror in the early 1960s nor The Sun in the 1980s and 1990s, has single-handedly changed the nation's political direction in so short a time. Papers, by their nature, rely on relaying the same message day after day. They build an agenda over time, which is one of the reasons that election endorsements a couple of days before polling are wholly irrelevant to the outcome.

No paper has really championed the Lib-Dems since the decline of the old Liberal party.

The News Chronicle, which vanished in 1960, was its last genuine newspaper champion, though The Guardian has been a regular supporter over 65 years. But, with the greatest of respect to that paper (for which I write a daily media blog), its influence on its relatively small, affluent and educated audience is nothing like as potent as that of a popular paper on its readership.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

It Won't Be the Newspapers Wot Won It; History Shows There Are Limits to the Press's Influence in Elections -- Even before Lib-Dems' Shock Rise in 2010; MEDIA ANALYSIS
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?