Byline: Jennifer Harper, THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Dueling numbers throw our differences into stark relief. A Pew Research Center poll of 995 adults reveals that six out of 10 Americans broadly approve of Arizona's tough new immigration law. But an Associated Press/Univision survey of a nearly equal number of Hispanic Americans finds that 67 percent oppose the new legislation, while 74 percent say illegal immigrants contribute to society. Nine out of 10 say the undocumented workers take jobs Americans don't want and that the nation should find a way to help them stay in the country.
The movement for human rights in Arizona and against the state's hateful laws is growing, says Pablo Alvarado, executive director of the National Day Laborer Organizing Network. We are calling for all people of conscience to come to Arizona the weekend of May 29th for a mass mobilization. We are living in a defining moment of our times, and we must rise to the occasion.
The menu includes quiche and fresh fruit, the musical interlude is titled Mother Must be Praying and the event in the Ronald Reagan Building is sold out. Sarah Palin's appearance on Friday at the Susan B. Anthony List's Celebration of Life Breakfast has proved very popular, indeed.
Gov. Palin believes in the Susan B. Anthony List and our commitment to ensuring that votes have consequences. She has been a partner in our mission since her candidacy, the group's president, Marjorie Dannenfelser, tells Inside the Beltway. We know that now is the peak and pivotal moment for every person of a like mind to join with us, and push toward a pro-life election day victory.
We shouldn't have to worry so much about who gets appointed to the Supreme Court. It shouldn't be the case that a single justice can make all of American society lurch from one direction to another. They shouldn't have that much power, says Wes Benedict, executive director of the Libertarian Party.
Elena Kagan will probably vote to advance liberal policy goals, just as some other justices vote to advance conservative policy goals. That is not the place of justices, who should be applying the Constitution, not trying to rewrite it to make society work better according to their views, Mr. Benedict continues.
Once upon a time, Congress felt it had a duty to legislate in accordance with the Constitution. Likewise, past presidents believed that they should veto laws that were not clearly constitutional. But in more recent years, both branches have thrown this crucial duty away. Now their attitude seems to be, 'We can pass anything we want to, and let the Supreme Court deal with it if they don't like it.' That was absolutely not what the American Founders had in mind, he adds.
Information on Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan is being eked out too slowly, says Carrie Severino, chief counsel for the Judicial Crisis Network. She is keenly interested in Miss Kagan's stint as former President Clinton's associate White House counsel and domestic policy …
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Article title: Hola, America. Contributors: Not available. Newspaper title: The Washington Times (Washington, DC). Publication date: May 14, 2010. Page number: A02. © 2009 The Washington Times LLC. COPYRIGHT 2010 Gale Group.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.