Race, Region, and Vote Choice in the 2008 Election: Implications for the Future of the Voting Rights Act

By Ansolabehere, Stephen; Persily, Nathaniel et al. | Harvard Law Review, April 2010 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Race, Region, and Vote Choice in the 2008 Election: Implications for the Future of the Voting Rights Act


Ansolabehere, Stephen, Persily, Nathaniel, Stewart, Charles,, III, Harvard Law Review


TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION: THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT AND THE ELECTION OF AN          1386
AFRICAN AMERICAN PRESIDENT

I.   THE POTENTIAL LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE 2008 ELECTION          1389

     A. The Role of Racially Polarized Voting in Litigation Under   1390
        Section 2 of the VRA

     B. The Coverage Formula for Section 5 of the VRA               1396

II.  RACIAL DIFFERENCES IN VOTING PRIOR TO 2008                     1400

     A. Presidential Election Exit Polls, 1984-2004                 1401

     B. The 2004 Election                                           1405

III. RACE AND VOTE CHOICE IN THE 2008 ELECTION                      1409

     A. National Results                                            1411

     B. The Section 5 Coverage Formula and the Results of the 2008  1413
        Election

     C. Accounting for Party and Ideology                           1424

     D. Race and Vote Choice in the 2008 Primary                    1431

CONCLUSION: CHANGE IN VOTING BEHAVIOR WE CAN BELIEVE IN?            1435

INTRODUCTION: THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT AND THE ELECTION OF AN AFRICAN AMERICAN PRESIDENT

When Congress passed the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (1) (VRA), the election of an African American President was inconceivable. Even when Congress reauthorized expiring provisions of the VRA in 2006, (2) such an election appeared a distant possibility. Now, as the Supreme Court has cast constitutional doubt on the reauthorized VRA, (3) what once seemed impossible or unlikely has become concrete and real: a member of the racial minority for whom the VRA was written occupies the Oval Office.

It is unsurprising, then, that the election of Barack Obama has led some commentators to question both the relevance (4) and the constitutionality (5) of the VRA. If an African American candidate can win a majority of the national vote and even do better than previous Democratic nominees among white voters in states as varied as Colorado, Indiana, and Virginia, do the fundamental assumptions underlying the VRA need to be rethought? In particular, does the 2008 election signal a fundamental shift in race-based patterns of voting behavior, such that the geographic reach of section 5 of the VRA (6) or the primacy of racially polarized voting in analysis under section 2 of the VRA (7) requires updating?

In this Article, we assess the patterns of race and political preference in the 2008 election and consider their relevance for the meaning and constitutionality of the VRA. (8) The exit polls and election returns suggest that the 2008 election did not represent a fundamental shift in national patterns of race and vote choice. However, these national patterns mask great variation at the state and county level. In particular, Obama's relative success among white voters, as compared to John Kerry four years earlier, varied greatly by region. In the Deep South, Obama actually did worse than Kerry among white voters. Nationally, Obama did much better among African Americans and Latinos, with both groups turning out to vote at higher rates and giving him a higher proportion of their votes.

We view these findings as principally a response to the charges that the 2008 election represented a fundamental transformation in voting patterns relevant to the VRA. However, we recognize that this evidence bears on an ongoing debate concerning the relevance of racially polarized voting patterns, particularly to the constitutionality of section 5 of the VRA, (9) as well as perhaps to the continued operation of section 2. In Part I we discuss the importance of racially polarized voting patterns for the meaning of section 2 and the constitutionality of section 5 of the VRA. Part II presents background data from 1984 to 2004 against which we can judge any transformation that took place in the 2008 election. The data show persistent differences between minorities and whites in their candidate preferences and between the preferences of whites in the covered and noncovered states.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Race, Region, and Vote Choice in the 2008 Election: Implications for the Future of the Voting Rights Act
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?