Social Change at the Harappan Settlement of Gola Dhoro: A Reading from Animal Bones

By Chase, Brad | Antiquity, June 2010 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Social Change at the Harappan Settlement of Gola Dhoro: A Reading from Animal Bones

Chase, Brad, Antiquity



The Indus civilisation (c. 2600-1900 BC) integrated several distinct regions into one of the world's first state-level societies. As Harappa, Mohenjodaro, and several other population centres in the alluvial plains of the Indus and Ghaggar-Hakra river systems emerged as large walled cities, many of the distinctive styles of material culture developed there came to be widely distributed in adjoining regions, such as Gujarat, where they had no local antecedents (Figure 1). While this is clear evidence that the residents of Gujarat during this period came to participate in inter-regional interaction networks to a greater extent than had previously been the case, the social processes by which they came to be incorporated into South Asia'S first urban society remain the subject of considerable debate.

Gola Dhoro, a small (~2ha) settlement situated on the northern coast of the peninsula of Saurashtra, is an ideal site at which to investigate these issues. Analyses of faunal remains from the site show how increased participation in inter-regional interaction networks is associated, firstly, with changes in the pastoral economies that provided the residents of the site with an important category of subsistence goods and, secondly, with changes in residents' domestic practices, specifically those relating to the consumption and preparation of meat.


The Indus civilisation in Gujarat

The developmental trajectory of the Indus civilisation in Gujarat during the formative Regionalisation Era (c. 3500-2600 BC) (Shaffer 1992) stands in stark contrast to that known from the alluvial valleys of the Indus and Ghaggar-Hakra rivers in Sindh and the Punjab. In these latter regions, studies of material culture (Mughal 1990) and excavations at sites such as Harappa (Meadow & Kenoyer 2008) demonstrate the clear and gradual development of what has come to be known as Harappan material culture and social practice. In contrast, the bulk of durable material culture from the relatively few excavated sites in Gujarat that date to this period is stylistically and technologically distinct from that known from Sindh and the Punjab (Ajithprasad 2002). While relatively little is yet known regarding the organisation of the pastoral economy practiced in Gujarat during this period, it is nevertheless clear that the residents of the region exploited domestic sheep, goat, cattle and water buffalo (Meadow & Patel 2003). The interpretation of many Regionalisation Era sites in Gujarat as pastoral encampments (Bhan 1994) and the occasional presence at these sites of pottery common in Sindh and the Punjab, has led to the hypothesis of a migration of pastoral peoples from Sindh during this period (Possehl 2007). These migrants would have encountered autochthonous populations who may have been responsible for the recently proposed indigenous domestication of several species of millet in this region (Fuller 2006).

The emergence of walled cities, the development of the as-yet-undeciphered Indus script, distinctive ceramic forms and decorative motifs, urban architectural technologies, and the production of a wide variety of distinctive personal ornaments signal the beginning of the Integration Era (c. 2600-1900 BC) (Kenoyer 1998; Possehl 2002). Urban growth in the alluvial floodplains of the Indus Valley was concomitant with the widespread distribution of Harappan material culture in adjoining regions, such as Gujarat, that were source areas for the semi-precious stones and marine shells from which many of the most distinctive and highly valued Harappan ornaments were crafted. Although this set of inter-related processes is generally understood as the first emergence of state-level society in South Asia, considerable debate remains regarding Indus political organisation during this period (e.g. Kenoyer 1994; Possehl 1998).

In Gujarat, Harappan material culture is most conspicuous at the large (~50ha) walled city of Dholavira (Bisht 2000) and at a network of about 25 small (<10ha) settlements (Sonawane 2005) including the excavated sites of Kanmer (Kharakwal et al.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Social Change at the Harappan Settlement of Gola Dhoro: A Reading from Animal Bones


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?