Review of Helen Hackett's: Shakespeare and Elizabeth: The Meeting of Two Myths: Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2009

By Gordon, Helen Heightsman | Journal of Social and Psychological Sciences, January 2010 | Go to article overview

Review of Helen Hackett's: Shakespeare and Elizabeth: The Meeting of Two Myths: Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2009


Gordon, Helen Heightsman, Journal of Social and Psychological Sciences


REVIEW

Helen Hackett appropriately uses the word 'myths' to characterise the apotheosis of the author William Shakespeare into a cultural deity and Elizabeth Tudor, his Queen, into an icon of virginity with ambiguous masculine/feminine powers. Hackett bases her book on a provocative question: Why is it that readers and writers over four centuries have tried to put Shakespeare and his Queen into a relationship--or at least acquaintanceship--although there is no evidence that the two ever met?

Hackett, a reader in English literature at University College in London, has previously written a book Virgin Mother, Maiden Queen: Elizabeth I and the Cult of the Virgin Mary [Macmillan, 1995]. In her new book she elaborates upon that study by showing how the myths about Shakespeare have sometimes paralleled, sometimes counterpoised, and frequently intertwined, those about Elizabeth. Hackett explains beautifully the process by which such mythologies arise. The myths are affected by time and place, according to the needs of a given culture, and thus they give us a window into the culture they reflect [6]. In England, for example, stories of imaginary meetings of the queen and the author have become one of England's (and Britain's) 'most entrenched and persistent cultural myths' [3]. As the British Empire expanded its power and influence around the world, British myths represented the superiority of the empire's cultural richness. As time passed, the stories became elaborated in both fiction and history, each building upon the other until fact became inseparable from fiction.

Elizabeth's image mutated from a national icon in the Sixteenth Century, embodying Protestant England, to a passionate woman with a scandalous private life, and many lovers, in the Seventeenth Century. In the Eighteenth Century, she was envisioned as complex and contradictory--majestic for having presided over a golden era, but personally coarse and unfeminine, vindictive and mean-spirited [62-63]. From her own reign through the present, she has been seen to reflect supposedly masculine qualities of a ruler (warlike courage, authority, judgment, dominance) and the qualities of the ideal woman (beauty, softness, mercifulness, etc.) [35]. Writers have emphasised whatever traits they find useful to portray her with admirable or despicable qualities, as Hackett demonstrates through an impressive array of examples from literature and drama.

In the Eighteenth Century Shakespeare's image was in the ascendant, beginning with Nicholas Rowe's biography in 1709, the primary source of the Stratfordian story. As Shakespeare was elevated to higher levels of admiration, Elizabeth's relative status diminished [38]. In the early 1700s, she had been represented as a gracious imperial lady whose patronage refined Shakespeare's art, whereas he was portrayed as a humble, provincial prankster, endowed with natural gifts that he developed under the Queen's benign influence. But as the century proceeded, Shakespeare was converted into a secular god; whereas Elizabeth's androgynous sexuality was at odds with Eighteenth-Century feminine ideals of modesty, politeness, and sensibility [38]. The two were sometimes represented as opposing social forces--aristocratic versus more egalitarian ideologies. Sometimes, influenced by French literary tastes, authors envisioned them as sexually attracted, irrespective of the age difference.

Across the Atlantic, the Americans were adapting the myths to emphasise the lowly origins and meteoric rise of a genius, consistent with American ideals of equality and opportunity. In America, the Queen was not vilified, but she definitely took second place to the Bard. The Nineteenth Century spawned new interest in the plays and poetry, as education became available to the working classes, and women became more self-reliant. Quoting Shakespeare became a mark of prestige and refinement. Yet inquiries into the authorship began to emerge, beginning with Delia Bacon (1850) and Thomas Looney in (1920), since a gap was perceived between the content of the plays and the traditional biography offered.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Review of Helen Hackett's: Shakespeare and Elizabeth: The Meeting of Two Myths: Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2009
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.