Evaluation of a Suite of Metrics for Component Based Software Engineering (CBSE)

By Narasimhan, V. Lakshmi; Parthasarathy, P. T. et al. | Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology, Annual 2009 | Go to article overview

Evaluation of a Suite of Metrics for Component Based Software Engineering (CBSE)


Narasimhan, V. Lakshmi, Parthasarathy, P. T., Das, M., Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology


Introduction

Component-Based Software Engineering (CBSE) is a methodology that emphasizes the design and construction of computer-based systems using reusable software components. This principle embodies an element of "buy, don't build" that shifts the emphasis from programming software to composing software systems (Pressman, 2001). It is also an approach for developing software that relies on software reuse and it emerged from the failure of object-oriented development to support effective reuse. The behavior and the stability of an application cannot be assessed unless it is tested comprehensively. The quality of the application is high when it yields the expected results, is stable and adaptable and leads to reduce maintenance costs. If a change has been introduced in a component, which has been integrated in an application, the impact of the change on the whole application has to be determined by the developer to assess the stability of the application. Consequently, there is certainly a need to measure quality and assess the component's impact on the overall system. Metrics are needed to measure several types of quality issues. Metrics are also needed to study the characteristics of a given software system under different scenarios (Ali & Ghafoor 2001 Bertoa, Troya, & Vallecillo 2003 Lorenz & Kidd 1992). Most of the existing metrics are applicable to small programs or components (Kan 2002), while the objective of CBSE metrics is to evaluate the behavior and reliability of the component when integrated into a large software system. Consequently (Weyuker, 1998), the lack of appropriate mathematical properties fails quality metrics. Metrics that have a sound theoretical basis become applicable to real life organizations (Pfleeger & Fenton, 1998). Some of the metrics rely on parameters that could never be measured or are too difficult to measure in practice. Since a component's internal structure may not be available, there is a need for black box testing and a number of existing metrics may not be applicable directly.

A software component is a coherent package of software implementation that offers well-defined and published interfaces, is reusable and that can be independently developed and delivered; such components are put together to form an application. However, there are no good metrics available to validate their effectiveness, when components are integrated together to form a complete system. Due to the inherent differences in the development of component based and non-component based systems, the traditional software metrics prove to be inappropriate for component-based systems. The component metrics alone are not sufficient for an integrated environment, because there is a need to measure the stability and adaptability of each component when it is integrated with other components.

Narasimhan and Hendradjaya (2007) noticed the lack of metrics that aids in reducing the maintenance costs and defined metrics whose values are collected during the execution phase. Such metrics are useful for assessing the maintenance cost of individual components and that of the application in which the component is integrated. This paper supports and critiques the ideas of Narasimhan and Hendradjaya in providing metrics for the integration of software components. A component when executed may yield the expected results, but its behavior and functionality, when integrated with other components to make a complete application, may yield unexpected results. Therefore, there is a need for metrics to assess the functionality of each component when integrated with other components and functionality of the application on the whole. The paper provides a comparison of various metrics and observes several views on the traditional metrics and the metrics proposed by Narasimhan and Hendradjaya are useful in assessing the quality of components in an integrated application. Benchmarks software programs have been used as inputs to instrumentation programs and metric values have been collected. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Evaluation of a Suite of Metrics for Component Based Software Engineering (CBSE)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.