The Structure of Terrorism Threats and the Laws of War

By Waxman, Matthew C. | Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, Spring 2010 | Go to article overview

The Structure of Terrorism Threats and the Laws of War


Waxman, Matthew C., Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law


INTRODUCTION

The threats of transnational terrorist networks in recent years have prompted calls for reexamining the law of war and its application to non-state entities. (1) The challenge of fitting counterterrorist operations--and the acts of terroristic individuals or entities themselves--into existing legal frameworks predates the September 11, 2001 attacks, (2) but the globe-spanning nature of the al Qaeda threat has raised the level of complexity and the stakes involved. Some states, forced to act quickly to respond to twenty-first century escalation of attacks and meet emerging threats, have struggled to fit their actions into the international law of armed conflict. (3) Legal academics have embraced this challenge as well. Some have considered the question in view of the nature and purposes of the international law of armed conflict, (4) while others have emphasized broader changes in the international order. (5)

Most legal debate has focused on the degree to which transnational terrorism does or does not resemble military and national security threats posed by state or localized guerrilla armies. Proponents of applying the law of armed conflict argue that modern terrorist organizations wage violence at a magnitude or sophistication previously achievable only by states or within local areas. Proponents of adapting the law of armed conflict argue that its basic principles fit contemporary circumstances reasonably well but that its specific rules should be modified. Opponents of adapting the law of armed conflict counter that the traditional law of armed conflict is adequate to regulate the use of force against terrorist organizations and fear that efforts at "revision" may provide intellectual cover for backsliding of humanitarian and liberty protections. (6) And opponents of even applying the law of armed conflict at all argue that contemporary terrorism threats are insufficiently analogous to military threats to merit its application. (7)

Where this debate, about whether and how the law of armed conflict might warrant adaptation, has fallen short is in its insufficient integration of analytical developments within the counter-terrorism community. This includes both intelligence assessment and relevant specialized social sciences. (8) Legal debate has tended to rely on a snapshot view of terrorism, or to speak in terms of "terrorist threats" as a monolithic category. This debate often fails to consider diverse sub-categories of actors and how terrorism or other non-state threats of tomorrow may look very different from those of yesterday and today. United States government rhetoric may be partly to blame for the conceptual haziness inherent in references to "terrorist groups," "terrorism," or even just "terror" as an undifferentiated policy construct.

This article considers a major debate in the American and European counterterrorism analytic community--whether the primary terrorist threat to the West is posed by hierarchical, centralized terrorist organizations operating from geographic safe havens, or by radicalized individuals conducting a loosely organized, ideologically common but operationally independent fight against western societies--and this debate's implications for the law of armed conflict.

While the broad consensus is that both phenomena are of great concern and not neatly separable, each view of the main terrorism threat to Western developed states poses a different set of challenges to current law of war models. If the main terrorist threat to the United States and its European allies reflects the former, "top-down" model, then existing law of war principles are a useful starting point, and with modest reform may be adapted to combating international terrorist organizations. (9) If the main terrorist threat resembles the latter, "bottom-up" model, existing law of war principles have much less to offer, and according to many proponents of that model their application is likely to be strategically counterproductive. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Structure of Terrorism Threats and the Laws of War
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.