Is English a Language? A Brief History of a Pointless Dispute: Richard Hudson Argues That the Dominant Identification of 'English' with 'English Literature' Has Marginalised the Study of the English Language as a Valuable Subject in Its Own Right

By Hudson, Richard | English Drama Media, June 2010 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Is English a Language? A Brief History of a Pointless Dispute: Richard Hudson Argues That the Dominant Identification of 'English' with 'English Literature' Has Marginalised the Study of the English Language as a Valuable Subject in Its Own Right


Hudson, Richard, English Drama Media


What is English?

What does the noun English mean? In ordinary usage there's no doubt that it's the name of a language: if I speak, understand or learn English, then what I am speaking, understanding or learning is a language. But put the word into an educational context, and uncertainty sets in. If you teach English, are you teaching a language or a body of literature or culture which happens to be written in English? And when the government describes English as a core subject, does it mean the study of the language or of its literature? It's not just English that faces these questions: exactly the same uncertainties afflict foreign language teaching, especially at university level. Where does the study of French--meaning of course the French language--fit into the programme of a French department? A BA programme in French or English need not have much to do with the language named in the title of the programme.

A matter of semantics? Yes, but not mere semantics the ambiguities in these language names really matter. The semantic shift away from the ordinary use of nouns like English and French is the only explanation for the very odd fact (which we all take for granted) that A-level English Language had to include the word language in its title in order to distinguish itself from what was then called simply 'English', which had very little to do with the English language. The same is true in universities, where departments have to add the word language to English in order to distinguish themselves from the so-called 'English' departments; so if you want to learn about English, you don't go to an English department but to one called 'English language'. Similar uncertainties exist in foreign languages, so ''Modern Foreign Languages' as a discipline has an identity which is vague and uncertain' (Worton 2009: 8).

The trouble with this semantic take-over is that it sets literature and language in quite unnecessary competition. If the subject called 'English' or 'French' is really about literature, then the language is at best a side-show; and vice versa. This competition serves no-one. Everyone agrees that the study of English literature is an important part of education, but as long as this study owns the title 'English' any increased focus on language threatens literature. The fact is that education needs the study of both language and literature to be strong, and to support each other rather than to be in competition. But putting the two together under a single subject name invites trouble, not least in terms of the expertise needed by an 'English' teacher.

Language and English: the early history

Uncertainty about the place of language seems to have been around for a long time, and may well have its origins in the universities rather than in the schools. Historically, the study of language in our universities was dominated by three dead languages--Latin, Greek and Hebrew--until the nineteenth century, when teaching was expanded to include not only English but also modern foreign languages. I'm proud to say that UCL led the way by including chairs of English, German, Italian, Spanish and even Hindustani among its very first chairs in 1828 (Harte and North 1991: 38). But UCL English was dominated in the nineteenth century by two names: Henry Morley (Professor of English from 1865-89), and W.P. Ker (1889-1922), both of whom specialised in literary history.

Oxbridge was slower off the mark. An important date for Oxford is 1885, when the Merton Chair of English Language and Literature was created. Even though the chair was ostensibly for both language and literature, there was considerable emphasis on Old and Middle English, so that students had to study large chunks of what was (and is) called 'philology' to get access to the literature; and the syllabus did not include either Modern English language or even modern literature (Hudson and Walmsley 2005). Literary enthusiasts naturally objected, and won the ensuing campaign against philology.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Is English a Language? A Brief History of a Pointless Dispute: Richard Hudson Argues That the Dominant Identification of 'English' with 'English Literature' Has Marginalised the Study of the English Language as a Valuable Subject in Its Own Right
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?