Protest or Process: Theodicy Responses to Elie Wiesel's the Trial of God

By Faulstick, Dustin H. | Renascence: Essays on Values in Literature, Summer 2010 | Go to article overview

Protest or Process: Theodicy Responses to Elie Wiesel's the Trial of God


Faulstick, Dustin H., Renascence: Essays on Values in Literature


I lived as a Jew, and it is as a Jew that I shall die--and it is as a Jew that, with my last breath, I shall shout my protest to God! And because the end is near, I shall shout louder! Because the end is near, I'll tell Him that He's more guilty than ever!

--Berish, 156

We are immortal. And rich. The forest is ours. The rivers. The stars--they shine brighter. And life is calling us, as we call life. Nothing frightens us, nothing leaves us indifferent; we live at the center of the world; we are the center of the world.

--Hanna, 152

WHEREAS John Milton has his speaker in Paradise Lost attempt "to justify the ways of God to men" (1:26), Elie Wiesel, in The Trial of God, has the devil do so (161). As a result, Wiesel significantly thickens the theodicy discussion. The need to justify God, that is, the need to do theodicy (formed from the Greek theo meaning god and dike meaning justice), arises from the seeming imbalance of 1) God's goodness, 2) God's power, and 3) the reality of evil. Responses to this imbalance offer ways to modify traditional understandings of one (or more) of these tenets. But changing any of these tenets must be done delicately. If one doing theodicy contends that God is not perfectly good or that God is not all-powerful, she challenges believers' understandings of God. On the other hand, if she attempts to explain the necessity of evil (for human freedom or other reasons), she risks insulting victims of intense evils and perpetuating (now justified) evil.

It is likely in part due to these dangers that Wiesel avoids explicit theological discussions. "I don't like the word 'theologian,'" he explains; "I find it disturbing" (qtd. in Abrahamson 217). As such, Wiesel prefers to speak to God rather than about God; and so diverse, inconclusive perspectives characterize much of his literature. Lawrence Langer suggests that "Wiesel's literary work is a sustained dramatization of counterpositions, a long monologue disguised as a series of dialogues, revealing his own divided self" (40). The Trial of God is complex and contradictory; it provides no clear answers and raises nearly impossible questions, leaving readers with the responsibility of trying to answer those questions for themselves.

Set in the seventeenth-century Ukrainian village of Shamgorod after the murder of all but two Jews, The Trial of God tells the story of the two Jewish survivors, three visiting Jewish minstrels, a loyal Christian servant named Maria, an ineffective priest, and the devil. Berish, an innkeeper, and his daughter Hanna have survived a recent pogrom (the organized mass murder of Jews in the village) but have witnessed the murder of their family and friends and suffered terribly: Hanna was raped repeatedly while Berish was forced to watch helplessly. So when the minstrels Mendel, Avremel, and Yankel arrive to perform a cheerful play for the Jewish festival of Purim, Berish understandably recommends putting God on trial instead. Berish volunteers for the role of prosecutor and the minstrels agree to play judges, with Mendel, the wisest among them, acting as head judge. Sam, who eventually reveals himself as Satan, appears just in time to serve as an attorney for God's defense. But as Sam develops a nuanced theodicy, he intentionally opens the characters to a second pogrom.

David Blumenthal calls the play "a modern rereading of the Book of Job" (250), a book with varying theodicies and difficult conclusions. Robert McAfee Brown emphasizes the play's relationship to Wiesel's life. As a boy of fifteen in Auschwitz, during a trial conducted by three Jewish scholars, Wiesel witnessed the condemnation of God for crimes against humanity. After the trial, they said evening prayers (vii). Brown then calls Berish "a strange affirmer" of God, but he celebrates such affirmation when it leads to an ethical response to evil (xvi-xviii). Matthew Fox makes the need for an ethical response explicit in his essay "The Trial of God, The Trial of Us.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Protest or Process: Theodicy Responses to Elie Wiesel's the Trial of God
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.