Chapter 25: Beyond Suffrage: Reconsidering Citizenship Education and Gender in the Social Studies Curriculum

By Schafer, Cynthia M.; Bohan, Chara Haeussler | Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, January-July 2009 | Go to article overview

Chapter 25: Beyond Suffrage: Reconsidering Citizenship Education and Gender in the Social Studies Curriculum


Schafer, Cynthia M., Bohan, Chara Haeussler, Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue


INTRODUCTION

Women who did not know that others like them had made intellectual contributions to knowledge and to creative thought were overwhelmed by the sense of their own inferiority or, conversely, the sense of the dangers of their daring to be different. Without knowledge of women's past, no group of women could test their own ideas against those of their equals, those who had come out of similar conditions and similar life situations. Every thinking woman had to argue with the "great man" in her head, instead of being strengthened and encouraged by her foremothers. For thinking women, the absence of Women's History was perhaps the most serious obstacle of all to their intellectual growth. (Lerner, 1993, p. 12)

As historian Gerda Lerner suggested in the 1990s, women's intellectual growth has been limited throughout history because women have been missing from the discourse of history. Absence from the pages of history perpetuates a patriarchal system where women appear as inferior and unequal to men. For decades, researchers have noted the omission of significant contributions made by women from social studies curriculum and texts as well as narratives of history (Clark, Allard, & Mahoney, 2004; Commeyras & Alvermann, 1996; Crocco, 1997; Minnich, 1990; Noddings, 2001; Tetreault, 1986; Woyshner, 2002). In addition, when women have received acknowledgement within traditional history, or Thomas Carlyle's "great men" of history approach (Goldberg, Brattin, & Engel, 1993), it has mostly occurred in relationship to how men define women. Noddings (2001) has suggested that this approach to studying women leads to a failure among students to "be impressed by any real female contributions" in history (p. 29).

Feminist scholars have suggested that the marginalization of women's contributions to history and the research from quantitative studies of commonly used textbooks (Clark et al., 2004; Clark, Ayton, Frechette, & Keller, 2005; Commeyras & Alverman, 1996) demonstrate little has changed. When there is an attempt to "infuse" or "write" women into the curriculum, it is often in smaller units covering commonly accepted contexts for women such as the antebellum period (Crocco, 1997; Levstik & Groth, 2002) or the suffrage movement (Crocco, 1995; Cruz & Groendal-Cobb, 1998; Karnes, 2000; Woyshner, 2002). Moreover, social studies curriculum standards developed by the National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS) reflect little emphasis placed on women and gender related topics (Hahn, Bernard-Powers, Crocco, & Woyshner, 2007) even when citizenship education is a primary purpose of these standards. As a key component of the K-12 social studies curriculum, citizenship education enables students to become active and engaged participants in society. More importantly, when history is not gender-balanced, both women and men will continue to perpetuate a patriarchal system that places women at disadvantages in society, and gender equity will never exist.

Given such a context, the focus of this research is a call for all social studies educators to reconsider how the social studies curriculum addresses citizenship education and gender. Some may think the topic of women missing from the discourse of history is a bit antiquated as a familiar theme. However, the fact that little has changed within the social studies curriculum makes this topic even more important for social studies educators to continue to address. If social studies educators support citizenship education, then citizenship rationales for social studies should occur within the context of concern for the presence of women in the curriculum (Hahn, 2002; Kerber, 1998; Makler, 1999; Minnich, 1990; Noddings, 1992). Furthermore, social studies educators need to question what is meant by citizenship in social studies education for the twenty-first century if women continue to be deprived of the knowledge of their history. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Chapter 25: Beyond Suffrage: Reconsidering Citizenship Education and Gender in the Social Studies Curriculum
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.