Life after DOMA

By Strasser, Mark P. | Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, May 2010 | Go to article overview

Life after DOMA


Strasser, Mark P., Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy


I. INTRODUCTION

During the 2008 presidential campaign, President Obama outlined his position on same-sex relationships. While making clear that he does not support same-sex marriage, he nonetheless suggested both that same-sex married couples should receive all of the benefits that different-sex married couples receive and that the Federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) (1) should be repealed. Further, in separate orders, two Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals judges--one liberal and the other conservative each recently suggested that one provision of the Defense of Marriage Act violated constitutional guarantees. (2) DOMA's days may well be numbered, whether as a result of its being struck down or repealed. Given that distinct possibility, the legal ramifications of a repeal or invalidation of either of DOMA's provisions should be discussed.

The Federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) has two provisions. One makes clear that states are not required by the Full Faith and Credit Clause to recognize same-sex marriages validly celebrated in other states, and the other defines marriage for federal purposes as the union of one man and one woman. The two provisions are designed to do different things, and Congress could repeal one without repealing the other. By the same token, a court could strike down one of the provisions without addressing the constitutionality of the other.

To understand the effect of the repeal or invalidation of one or both DOMA provisions, it is necessary to understand what each does. While there is little or no dispute about some of the implications of the DOMA provisions, the Act was not drafted with as much care as might have been desired, (3) and there are certain ambiguities that have not been clarified by the courts.

Some possible interpretations and implications of the ambiguous provisions are included below. Ironically, on some interpretations of DOMA, the repeal or invalidation of the Act will have little or no effect on the power of states to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages validly celebrated elsewhere, although on other interpretations the repeal or invalidation of DOMA would have important effects. What is clear, however, is that the repeal or invalidation of one provision of DOMA will have important ramifications for some same-sex couples, and the repeal or invalidation of the other provision will have important implications for some of the state Defense of Marriage Acts that have been passed.

Part II of this essay discusses the two DOMA provisions, including what they may mean and some of the ways that they are constitutionally vulnerable. Part III discusses some of the effects and non-effects of the repeal or invalidation of either DOMA provision. The essay concludes that while many of the exaggerated claims of members of Congress about the need for DOMA will be laid to rest as groundless, the repeal or invalidation of DOMA will benefit LGBT families and society as a whole in a number of tangible and intangible ways.

II. DOMA

The Defense of Marriage Act has one provision ostensibly affecting full faith and credit guarantees and another provision defining marriage for federal purposes. While the latter provision's meaning and reach seem relatively straightforward, the same cannot be said of the former, which is ambiguous in a very significant way. Each provision is constitutionally vulnerable, sometimes for the same reason and sometimes for different reasons, which provides support for the prediction that one or both will be repealed or struck down in the not-too-distant future.

A. Why Was the Defense of Marriage Act Passed?

In 1993, the Hawaii Supreme Court decided Baehr v. Lewin, (4) which involved a challenge to the state's same-sex marriage ban. Rather than simply strike down the restriction, the court instead made clear that the ban should be examined in light of the strictest standard under the Hawaii Constitution, and then remanded the case for evaluation in light of that standard. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Life after DOMA
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.