You Have to Speak Up to Remain Silent: The Supreme Court Revisits the Miranda Right to Silence

By Rudd, Jonathan L. | The FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, September 2010 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

You Have to Speak Up to Remain Silent: The Supreme Court Revisits the Miranda Right to Silence

Rudd, Jonathan L., The FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin

Forty-four years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down one of its most famous decisions--Miranda v. Arizona. (1) In Miranda, the Court addressed the application of the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination to in-custody interrogations and attempted "to give concrete constitutional guidelines for law enforcement agencies and courts to follow." (2) Despite these guidelines and the fact that "Miranda has become embedded in routine police practice to the point where the warnings have become part of our national culture," (3) the practical application of Miranda continues to be debated and refined. This article focuses on the Supreme Court's most recent decision in this area, Berghuis v. Thompkins, which was decided on June 1, 2010, and shines new light on issues surrounding both the invocation and waiver of the Miranda right to remain silent. (4)


Setting the Stage

In Miranda, the Court held that "the prosecution may not use statements [...] stemming from custodial interrogation of the defendant unless it demonstrates the use of procedural safeguards effective to secure the privilege against self-incrimination." (5) The procedural safeguards mandated by the Court are a specific set of warnings that must be given to individuals who are in custody and subject to interrogation. (6) As one modern textbook explains, "The formula should be as easy as 1 + 1 = 2; that is, 'custody' + 'interrogation' = the requirement that Miranda warnings be given." (7)

Once the warnings have been given, subjects must waive their rights before making any statements that can be used against them at trial, or, in the alternative, subjects may invoke the right to silence, the Miranda right to counsel, or both. Once either or both of these rights are invoked, all questioning of subjects must cease. "Although the rule seems straightforward enough, a number of issues arise in cases regarding the application of Miranda that typically hinge on the meaning of [the] terms: custody, interrogation, warning, [invocation] and waiver." (8) Berghuis is one of these cases.

As we will see, the issue in Berghuis is not whether the subject was in custody or whether appropriate warnings were given. "The dispute centers on the response--or nonresponse--from the suspect" once the warnings were given. More specifically, in Berghuis, the Court refines the meaning and scope of an invocation and waiver of the Miranda right to silence.

Berghuis v. Thompkins

In Berghuis, Van Chester Thompkins was arrested in Ohio for a shooting that occurred approximately 1 year earlier in Southfield, Michigan. While in custody, Thompkins was questioned by two detectives in a police interview room. At the beginning of the interrogation, the detectives presented Thompkins with a general set of Miranda warnings. (9)

To make sure Thompkins could understand English, one of the detectives asked Thompkins to read a portion of the warnings out loud, which he did. Thereafter, the detective read the rest of the warnings to Thompkins and asked him to sign the form, indicating that he understood his rights. Thompkins refused to sign the form, and the officers began interrogating Thompkins. "At no point during the interrogation did Thompkins say that he wanted to remain silent, that he did not want to talk with the police, or that he wanted an attorney." (10)

With the exception of some minor verbal responses and limited eye contact, Thompkins remained silent for most of the 3-hour interview. Approximately 2 hours and 45 minutes into the interrogation, one of the detectives asked Thompkins if he believed in God. Thompkins said that he did. The detective then followed up by asking Thompkins if he prayed to God. Thompkins said, "Yes." The detective then asked, "Do you pray to God to forgive you for shooting that boy down?" To which, Thompkins answered, "Yes." Thompkins refused to make a written statement, and the interrogation ended.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

You Have to Speak Up to Remain Silent: The Supreme Court Revisits the Miranda Right to Silence


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?