La Course Au Centre: Policy Convergence and Partisanship in France, 1981-2002

By Marthaler, Sally | French Politics, Culture and Society, Summer 2010 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

La Course Au Centre: Policy Convergence and Partisanship in France, 1981-2002


Marthaler, Sally, French Politics, Culture and Society


Policy convergence between the political parties and the perception among voters that there is little to choose between left and right may be factors in the declining levels of partisanship observed in many advanced industrial democracies, including France, where these conditions emerged in the 1980s. Drawing on both quantitative and qualitative data, this article analyzes changes in the actual and perceived level of convergence between the mainstream parties in France from 1981 to 2002. It finds evidence of increasing policy convergence over the period as a result of a combination of endogenous and exogenous factors. It concludes that left-right ideological labels are still important to voters, even though they too have moved to the center, and that many of them want to see a clear dividing-line between the parties. The blurring of the boundaries between left and right and the "reversibility" of the mainstream parties bas also enhanced the appeal of alternative and extremist parties.

Keywords: policy convergence, voters, political parties, left-right ideology, France

**********

The erosion of partisan ties observed since the 1960s in many advanced industrial democracies has been attributed to a cluster of factors associated with societal modernization which accelerated in the postwar period. * Among these factors, the convergence or homogenization of social conditions and lifestyles has presented the established political parties with a number of challenges. In the first place, they can no longer rely on the solid support bases provided by socially-cohesive electorates, but instead have to broaden their appeal to attract voters from beyond the clearly-defined confines of their 'natural' class-based constituencies. Downsian theories of policy convergence and divergence in a bipolar party system predict that, in order to maximize votes, vote-seeking parties will converge on the position of the median voter who lies at the center of the voter distribution. (1) However, by gravitating toward this median ideological position, and possibly thereby renouncing a position of principle with which it has previously been strongly associated, a party exposes itself to the risk of alienating those of its voters who are furthest away from the median voter or most strongly attached to its previous ideological position. Left-wing parties in particular face an electoral trade-off between different groups of voters. With the decline of the working class, they have had to target the 'middle majority,' but by so doing they risk losing the support of their former core constituencies, who interpret the move to the center ground as a betrayal of the parties' ideological roots. (2) As a result of this course au centre, the dominant parties may end up offering very similar programs, thereby losing their previous ideological distinctiveness.

The perception among the electorate that there is little difference between the established parties, and hence a lack of choice, is likely to have an impact on the voter-party relationship for, as Hermann Schmitt and Soren Holmberg observe, "Partisanship grows best on ground well fertilised with ideological conflict." Schmitt and Holmberg further note that "when ideological conflicts between parties diminish, people's need of parties abates and partisanship becomes less intense". Similarly, declining levels of issue conflict undercut the relevance of the parties and might also be expected to lead to a loosening of partisan ties among the electorate. In the case of France, Schmitt and Holmberg found that by the 1980s political polarization was indeed declining and issue conflicts were low. (3) Between 1958 and 1983, by contrast, French political life was highly polarized. In the early years of the Fifth Republic, the growth of Gaullism led to rapid partisan alignment along a single "Gaullism/anti-Gaullism" dimension, and at the beginning of Mitterrand's first septennat the policies pursued by the traditional Left were radically different from those of the Right.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

La Course Au Centre: Policy Convergence and Partisanship in France, 1981-2002
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?