Reanalyses of Group Telepathy Data with a Focus on variability/Re-Analyses Des Donnees De Telepathie En Groupe Avec Un Focus Sur la variabilite/Reanalisis De Datos De Telepatia Grupal Con Un Foco En la variabilidad/Reanalysen Von Daten Bei Gruppentelepathie Fokussiert Auf Variabilitat

By Dalkvist, Jan; Montgomery, William et al. | The Journal of Parapsychology, Spring 2010 | Go to article overview

Reanalyses of Group Telepathy Data with a Focus on variability/Re-Analyses Des Donnees De Telepathie En Groupe Avec Un Focus Sur la variabilite/Reanalisis De Datos De Telepatia Grupal Con Un Foco En la variabilidad/Reanalysen Von Daten Bei Gruppentelepathie Fokussiert Auf Variabilitat


Dalkvist, Jan, Montgomery, William, Montgomery, Henry, Westerlund, Joakim, The Journal of Parapsychology


The vast majority of ESP experiments have been performed and analyzed at the individual level. That is, data have been collected for each participant individually, and the unit of analysis has been the participant, even though the results in general have been summarized at the group level.

One reason why group experiments on ESP are relatively rare is probably the old and widespread opinion that group testing is inferior to individual testing in producing positive results (see, e.g., Rhine, 1947/1971). In line with this negative evaluation, several later studies have failed to produce any positive results (e.g., Haight, Weiner, & Morrison, 1978; Milton & Wiseman, 1999). Positive results have also been reported, however (Barker, Messer, & Drucker, 1975; Carpenter, 1988; Dalkvist & Westerlund, 1998), but attempts to replicate some of these results have failed (Carpenter, 1991; Westerlund & Dalkvist, 2004).

In any case, it would be premature to abandon group testing at this point in time. One reason is that, thus far, too few well-controlled group studies using different designs and types of ESP tasks have been tested to permit any definite assessment of the merits and drawbacks of group testing. For example, most studies have been concerned with clairvoyance or precognition and not with telepathy. Besides the above-mentioned studies by two of us (JD and JW), we know of only one group telepathy study (Auriol et al., 2004). This long-term experimental series failed to demonstrate any deviation from chance expectation with respect to performance level, bur performance variations among experiments that deviated significantly from chance expectation were found.

Another reason for continuing to use group testing is that this method is much less time-consuming than individual testing is. Thus, as long as we are not certain that group testing, in contrast to individual testing, will fail to uncover any ESP phenomena, group testing should be used for purely practical reasons. A further, less obvious, reason for not abandoning group testing in ESP research is that ESP may be critically dependent on social factors, such as the psychological atmosphere in a group of senders or receivers in a telepathy experiment.

Unfortunately, when running group experiments, one is faced with a big statistical problem, called "stacking," which probably has made many researchers refrain from doing group experiments. The problem is this: Due to the possible occurrence of dependency among participants' responses in group testing (e.g., due to the occurrence of a common response bias, such as a tendency on the part of the respondents to give one type of response at the beginning of a run and another type at the end of it), the statistical assumption of independent measures runs the risk of being violated. In general, the stacking effect acts to inflate the results by effectively reducing "n" in any (conventional) statistical test due to the occurrence of positive correlations among participants' responses caused by stacking (for example, when all participants invariably respond in exactly the same way, the effective n is reduced to one).

There are several ways of overcoming the stacking problem, however. One is by statistically correcting the data for the effects (Thoules & Brier, 1970), although this method is in general extremely laborious or uncertain, depending on the specific technique being used.

Another solution is to let the whole group of participants who have been subjected to the same experimental treatment be the measurement object in a statistical analysis, and not the individual participant, the rationale behind this method being, of course, that correlations among responses within groups become irrelevant by this procedure and that no stacking effect can occur among different groups because of the lack of communication among them. There are drawbacks to this method, however.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Reanalyses of Group Telepathy Data with a Focus on variability/Re-Analyses Des Donnees De Telepathie En Groupe Avec Un Focus Sur la variabilite/Reanalisis De Datos De Telepatia Grupal Con Un Foco En la variabilidad/Reanalysen Von Daten Bei Gruppentelepathie Fokussiert Auf Variabilitat
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.