Can Our Field Have a Mission?

By Zeigler, Earle F. | JOPERD--The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, September 2010 | Go to article overview

Can Our Field Have a Mission?


Zeigler, Earle F., JOPERD--The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance


Now, well into my 70th active year in a field that has been searching for a "consensual name" for well over a century, I admit that at one point I too thought that the question had been resolved. I can remember C. H. McCloy (arguably the top "physical educator/scientist" of the first half of the 20th century) telling me in the early 1950s, "To change the name away from physical education now would be akin to rolling back Niagara Falls." Perhaps this was not the best comparison, since ice dams have, on occasion, "rolled back" the falls.

It is now an established fact that our field (originally called "physical education") has at least tentatively decided to call itself "kinesiology." Michael Wade in 2007 offered a number of insightful reactions in "Quo Vadis Kinesiology," a presentation that pointed out our field's highly disturbing lack of orientation, embodied in the name change and characterized by the absence of a clear statement of mission.

Wade's presentation was to members of the American Academy of Kinesiology and Physical Education (AAKPE). This scholarly group of 100 (elected) scholars separated itself in the early 1990s from the founding professional society, AAHPERD, which of course spawned us all in 1885, under its original name, the Association for the Advancement of Physical Education. This separation could be considered emblematic of the fragmentation that has beset our field in recent decades.

It was discouraging upon review of the 2006 proceedings of AAKPE to find that the academy had just written out of the "discipline" my five areas of scholarly endeavor. My books and articles to date have related to the historical, philosophical, management theory, international-comparative, and professional preparation aspects of physical activity education and educational and recreational sport. In program planning, these areas were eliminated from the "disciplinary component" invented by the current AAKPE seers. Yet each of these areas, I feel certain, has solid "knowledge contributions" to make to the lives of humans who, one hopes, will continue to be involved in purposeful participation in physical activity and related health education worldwide.

Generally speaking, as I look back over my years of experience in the field, I feel that the development of a "disciplinary thrust" in the 1960s and thereafter was a good thing. However, the way it was done--by complete separation of a number of sub-disciplinary groups ranging from history, philosophy, sociology, physiology, psychology, and many others (including the separation of AAKPE itself from the parent body, AAHPERD)--has proved to be a mistake. These subdisciplines are all "out there" now like the famous "floating apex" of "Peter Principle" fame--in other words, each is a scholarly society with nothing underneath it. The respective disciplines to which they each fled (e.g., philosophy) barely know that they exist!

The public, too, doesn't know about them; the field of education doesn't know it; and physical educators and coaches worldwide hardly know (or care!) that they are there either. Meanwhile, the people from different specialties within some of these societies often don't speak to each other as well. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Can Our Field Have a Mission?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.