'Killed by Its Mother': Infanticide in Providence County, Rhode Island, 1870 to 1938

By Caron, Simone | Journal of Social History, Fall 2010 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

'Killed by Its Mother': Infanticide in Providence County, Rhode Island, 1870 to 1938


Caron, Simone, Journal of Social History


  In July 2002 nineteen-year-old Sophia Whitey gave birth alone to a
  live baby boy. Sophia placed him in a plastic hag, and then in her an
  trunk. No one in her family knew she was pregnant. (1)

As the Whitley case demonstrates, infanticide is not merely a historical topic. By 2009, all fifty stares responded to it with laws that established "safe havens" at which parents could abandon unharmed infants within seven days of birth and face no legal repercussions. Yet infanticide continues: one study estimates that eighty-five infanticides occur annually in the United States. Women now and in the past generally committed infanticide due to fears of social ostracism, attempts to conceal illicit affairs, and/or dire economic straights. Based on Coroners' Records for Providence County, Rhode Island, this article analyzes medical attitudes toward mothers who killed from 1870 to 1938. This period extends past most historical studies of American infanticide, in turn a crucial aspect in modern society. The nineteenth and early twentieth centuries witnessed a medical discourse on the possibility of postpartum insanity as a cause of infanticide. While some women claimed temporary insanity, and some doctors legitimated this defense, its application was arbitrary at best. Doctors determined who deserved this diagnosis based on the woman's character, forthrightness, and extenuating circumstances. Physicians were not a monolithic bloc: infanticide divided the profession both nationally and locally and prevented them from speaking in a united voice on the issue. This article does not follow infanticide cases through to jury verdicts. Instead, it uses a case study approach to analyze the circumstances women faced that led them to kill their newborns, and the doctors', coroners', and medical examiners' responses to these women's actions. Age, marital, or immigrant status were not as important as visible violence to an infant's body in determining a finding of infanticide.

Scholars have examined infanticide from legal and social standpoints. Peter C. Hoffer and N.E.H. Hull argue that this crime became "highly visible" in colonial New England. While laws against it were harsh, the legal system gave mothers the benefit of the doubt unless overwhelming evidence existed against her.-Michelle Oberman examines infanticide in Chicago between 1870 and 1930 and finds that courts convicted only one woman, demonstrating the leniency of judges and juries to defendants often seen as victims of male seduction, a conclusion substantiated by Mark Jackson.' Johanna Greyer-Kordesch argues the opposite: mothers who killed were not victims but active agents with "aspirations" who took decisive steps to protect their jobs and reputations, and to "reject the gendered trajectory" of motherhood. (4) What is missing from the literature is an examination of the medical profession's view of infanticide. (5) James C. Mohr's Doctors and the Law discusses medical jurisprudence with particular attention to insanity, but not infanticide. The present article adds to the historiography by arguing that American physicians did not reach consensus on infanticide and insanity. Applying the discourse in American medical journals on infanticide and insanity to case studies based on Coroner's Reports provides otherwise absent information on the circumstances of individual women's lives that led them to kill and professional responses to this crime. (6)

This study also allows a comparison of American with European, particularly British, reaction to infanticide. The American legal system regarding infanticide differed, and continues to differ, from Western Europe. Colonial Massachusetts, for example, applied the death penalty to these women, while many Western European nations defined them as mentally ill. Ian Lambie argues that in Europe "madness after childbirth was historically considered a frequent affliction." Fifteenth-century French courts sometimes granted leniency to women based on mental disturbance.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

'Killed by Its Mother': Infanticide in Providence County, Rhode Island, 1870 to 1938
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?