Revising the Standard Occupational Classification System for 2010: The Standard Occupational Classification System, Recently Revised for 2010, Assists Federal Statistical Agencies in Organizing the Occupational Data They Collect, Analyze, and Disseminate; Agencies Have Begun Using the New System for Data That Will Be Published with a Reference Year of 2010

By Cosca, Theresa; Emmel, Alissa | Monthly Labor Review, August 2010 | Go to article overview

Revising the Standard Occupational Classification System for 2010: The Standard Occupational Classification System, Recently Revised for 2010, Assists Federal Statistical Agencies in Organizing the Occupational Data They Collect, Analyze, and Disseminate; Agencies Have Begun Using the New System for Data That Will Be Published with a Reference Year of 2010


Cosca, Theresa, Emmel, Alissa, Monthly Labor Review


The Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system is used for classifying all occupations in the U.S. economy, including private, public, and military occupations, in order to provide a means to organize occupational data. This article describes the process used to revise the 2000 SOC system for 2010, the scope and nature of changes incorporated, new and improved features, and plans for implementation and future revisions.

Statistical classification systems describe complex groups of interrelated items in a rational manner in order to promote consistent data collection. An optimal system would allow sharing and merging of data and information to support decision making across organizations with disparate missions. With this goal in mind, occupational classification schemes such as the SOC system examine the millions of jobs in the economy and organize them into occupations on the basis of their similarities as determined by the schemes' classification principles.

Almost every job is similar to a number of other jobs, even though the exact group of tasks is often, but not always, unique to each worker. Workers in an establishment perform specific sets of tasks that are largely dependent on factors such as the size of the establishment, its industry classification, and the tasks performed by other workers in the same establishment. Under both the 2000 and 2010 SOC systems, jobs are grouped into occupations on the basis of classification principles--the tenets forming the basis on which the system is structured. To fill the need for enhanced guidance on assigning codes and titles to survey responses and other coding activities, the 2010 SOC system augmented the classification principles with precise coding guidelines. (See the box on page 33.)

Occupational data are important to a wide variety of people and institutions, including job training providers, employment agencies, jobseekers, students, business and government officials, and researchers who study the supply and demand of labor. These people and institutions need data that are comparable across data sources and supported by specific and current descriptions of the type of work performed in each occupation.

History of the SOC system

The Federal Government published the first SOC manual in 1977 in an attempt to unify agencies' independent collection of occupational data. The 1977 SOC system was revised for 1980, but neither of these systems was universally adopted. Many agencies continued to collect occupational data by use of classification systems that differed from the 1980 SOC system.

In response to a need for a common occupational classification system, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) chartered the Standard Occupational Classification Revision Policy Committee (SOCRPC) (1) in 1994 and tasked it with devising a uniform classification system. The OMB asked the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) to chair the SOCRPC and coordinate the work of the Committee. The SOCRPC and the OMB developed and published the 2000 Standard Occupational Classification Manual and established the Standard Occupational Classification Policy Committee (SOCPC) to monitor the implementation of the new SOC system and carry out periodic revisions. Chester Levine, Laurie Salmon, and Daniel Weinberg described the history and characteristics of the 2000 SOC system and documented the 2000 revision process in a May 1999 Monthly Labor Review article. (2)

To accurately describe the labor force, classification systems must adapt to change in a timely and systematic manner. Determining how often to revise the SOC system in order to capture and report detailed employment, wage, and other data required balancing the need for an up-to-date taxonomy against the ability to track occupational changes over time and the desire to minimize disruption to survey collection processes and data series. In light of these factors, the revision of the 2000 SOC system was targeted for the year 2010. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Revising the Standard Occupational Classification System for 2010: The Standard Occupational Classification System, Recently Revised for 2010, Assists Federal Statistical Agencies in Organizing the Occupational Data They Collect, Analyze, and Disseminate; Agencies Have Begun Using the New System for Data That Will Be Published with a Reference Year of 2010
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.