Examination of the Cross-Battery Approach for the Cognitive Assessment of Children and Youth from Diverse Linguistic and Cultural Backgrounds

By Kranzler, John H.; Flores, Cindi G. et al. | School Psychology Review, September 2010 | Go to article overview

Examination of the Cross-Battery Approach for the Cognitive Assessment of Children and Youth from Diverse Linguistic and Cultural Backgrounds


Kranzler, John H., Flores, Cindi G., Coady, Maria, School Psychology Review


The racial and ethnic composition of the public schools is rapidly changing. The percentage of racial/ethnic minority students enrolled in kindergarten through high school increased from 22% in 1972 to 44% in 2007 (National Center for Education Statistics, 2009a). Hispanics were the fastest growing minority group during that period, currently representing 21% of public school enrollment. The number of English language learners (ELLs) in the schools also increased dramatically in recent years. The National Center for Education Statistics reported that the number of students identified as English language learners and receiving English as a second language (ESL) services increased from 2 to 3 million between 1994 and 2000. By 2004, that number increased to 3.8 million students (National Center for Education Statistics, 2009b). In 2007, slightly more than 20% of students between the ages of 5 and 17 spoke a language other than English at home and spoke English with some difficulty (Crawford, 2009). Given the shifting demographics of the public schools today, the provision of state-of-the-art psychological services to children and youth from diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds is an increasingly important concern.

Cognitive Assessment of Diverse Children and Youth

Research on test bias strongly suggests that, for English-speaking children born and raised in the United States, the major standardized tests of cognitive ability are not substantially biased, regardless of racial/ethnic group or socioeconomic class (e.g., Brown, Reynolds, & Whitaker, 1999; Jensen, 1980; Neisser et al., 1996). This conclusion, however, does not generalize beyond native-born, English-speaking children and youth (e.g., Figueroa, 1990). The test's language does matter, especially for those whose first language differs from the language of the assessment (English) or who are bilingual and limited English proficient.

What, then, should school psychologists do when assessing the cognitive ability of children who are not proficient in English, fully acculturated in mainstream American society, or both? The longstanding best practice recommendation has been to use a nonverbal test (e.g., Figueroa, 1990). In a recent comparative review, Braden and Athanasiou (2005) concluded that the most widely used contemporary nonverbal measures of cognitive ability tend to have strong psychometric properties and adequate norms to support their use with diverse populations. In addition, a number of these tests, such as the Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test (Bracken & McCallum, 1998), the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (Naglieri, 2003), and the Leiter International Performance Scale--Revised (Roid & Miller, 1997), are based on well-articulated models of intelligence. Results of recent research has substantiated the utility of nonverbal assessment for children and youth from diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds (e.g., Lohman, Korb, & Lakin, 2008; Lohman & Lakin, 2008; Naglieri, Booth, & Winsler, 2004). Lohman and Lakin (2008), for example, demonstrated that nonverbal tests of cognitive ability are a valuable component in a comprehensive system for identifying intellectual giftedness among ELLs.

Flanagan, Ortiz, and Alfonso (2007), however, recently asserted that "there is an emerging body of research that suggests that nonverbal tasks may actually carry as much if not more cultural content than that found in verbal tests" (p. 165). Indeed, all psychometric tests have varying degrees of cultural loading and all require some form of communication between the examiner and examinee. When the test performance of children and youth from diverse backgrounds primarily reflects level of acculturation and English-language proficiency rather than the cognitive ability constructs the test was intended to measure, the interpretation of scores is invalid. Development of a method to differentiate between children and youth who are experiencing learning difficulties because of differences in language or cultural background and those who are experiencing learning difficulties because of some type of disability would be a significant contribution to research and practice (Artiles & Klingner, 2006). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Examination of the Cross-Battery Approach for the Cognitive Assessment of Children and Youth from Diverse Linguistic and Cultural Backgrounds
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.