Accountability in Teenage Dating Violence: A Comparative Examination of Adult Domestic Violence and Juvenile Justice Systems Policies

By Zosky, Diane L. | Social Work, October 2010 | Go to article overview

Accountability in Teenage Dating Violence: A Comparative Examination of Adult Domestic Violence and Juvenile Justice Systems Policies


Zosky, Diane L., Social Work


The adult criminal justice system's domestic violence policies hold perpetrators accountable for their violence, but the juvenile justice system rarely addresses teenage dating violence (Buel, 2003).With the emergence of domestic violence as a major social problem, institutions in society responded with policies and services designed for prevention of and intervention around this issue. Domestic violence policies and laws were enacted at the federal and state levels; services for victims and, later, perpetrators, were developed; and an explosion of research sought to explore, understand, and evaluate the issue of domestic violence and the subsequent responses. The expansive interest in intimate partner violence (IPV), although warranted, has remained largely focused on this issue with adult victims and perpetrators (Hickman, Jaycox, & Aronoff, 2004). Teenage dating violence is a significant yet often overlooked issue within youth culture and the broader society (Sanders, 2003).

Rates of adolescent dating violence vary across studies. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) conducts one of the largest studies on risk behavior with the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System. This system surveys a variety of risk behaviors in youths in grades 7 through 12 and includes questions about perpetration and victimization of physical and sexual violence. Data collected from 2007 indicate that 9.9 percent of youths identified as victims of physical adolescent dating violence during the previous 12 months (CDC, 2008). The prevalence was higher among boys (11 percent) than girls (8.8 percent).

Other single studies on adolescent dating violence have produced much higher rates of victimization and perpetration. Among teenagers in grades 6 through 12, 36 percent reported inflicting violence on their dates, whereas 34 percent reported having received violence in a dating relationship (Gray & Foshee, 1997). Molidar, Tolman, and Kober (2000) found that 36 percent of female adolescents and 37 percent of male adolescents experienced physical dating violence. A New York City sample of youths found that as many as 57 percent of girls experienced physical violence, with 38 percent of boys reporting being victimized (Watson, Cascardi, Avery-Leaf, & O'Leary, 2001). Rates of dating violence among adolescents are at least as high as they are for adult IPV (Bennett & Fineran, 1998), yet adolescent dating violence often goes unreported, with victims and perpetrators never being referred for services.

There may be many reasons why the issue of teenage dating violence has lagged behind adult domestic violence, and policy development may be one contributing factor. A comparative examination of juvenile justice and domestic violence policies reveals very different histories, philosophies, and trajectories of policy development. Domestic violence policies were largely enacted to address adult IPV within the criminal justice system, whereas the juvenile justice system was developed to protect youths from the harshness of the adult criminal justice system. The implication of policy disparity may be one contributing reason that teenage dating violence has received a different societal response than adult domestic violence. Teenage dating violence may be "falling through the cracks" between two policy approaches. This article examines and compares policies from the juvenile justice system and the domestic violence field. The difference between these two policy responses may contribute to how teenage dating violence becomes defined and, thus, determine the response.

POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND TRAJECTORY: JUVENILE JUSTICE

Important policy developments within the juvenile justice system include the establishment of juvenile courts, inclusion of due process protection for juveniles, the development of a rehabilitative treatment response to juvenile crime, and the eventual return to a more punitive approach to juvenile offenders.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Accountability in Teenage Dating Violence: A Comparative Examination of Adult Domestic Violence and Juvenile Justice Systems Policies
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.