When Was the Least-Lame Lame Duck?
Stone, Daniel, Picon, Michael, Newsweek
Byline: Daniel Stone and Michael Picon
These post-election periods are traditionally most controversial in times like this, when a party is on deadline to cede the majority (in one, if not both, chambers). And with everything on Congress's docket this month and next--tax cuts, "don't ask, don't tell," a nuclear-arms treaty with Russia--some historians say 2010 could be among the most eventful lame-duck sessions. An unscientific assessment of others of great consequence:
1800 President John Adams
House* Jeffersonian Republicans, +22; Federalists, -22
An indecisive Electoral College vote left the choice of president to the House. Alexander Hamilton, a Federalist, worked his allies to approve Thomas Jefferson (instead of rival Aaron Burr). After days of backroom dealmaking, the outgoing Federalist majority voted Jefferson--a Jeffersonian Republican, but considered the more benign of two "bad" candidates--the third president.
President James Buchanan
House* Democrats,-39; GOP, -8
Republicans lost seats the year one of their own, Abraham Lincoln, won the presidency--but Democrats lost more (both to a third party), which gave Republicans a controlling majority. That's when things got interesting: Southern Democrats from six states walked out of the session, a move widely seen by historians as the starting point of the Civil War.
President Ulysses S. Grant
House* GOP, -96; Democrats, +94 …
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Article title: When Was the Least-Lame Lame Duck?. Contributors: Stone, Daniel - Author, Picon, Michael - Author. Magazine title: Newsweek. Volume: 156. Issue: 22 Publication date: November 29, 2010. Page number: 56. © 2009 Newsweek, Inc. All rights reserved. Any reuse, distribution or alteration without express written permission of Newsweek is prohibited. For permission: www.newsweek.com. COPYRIGHT 2010 Gale Group.