Citizen Participation and Performance Measurement: Operationalizing Democracy through Better Accountability

By Halachmi, Arie; Holzer, Marc | Public Administration Quarterly, Fall 2010 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Citizen Participation and Performance Measurement: Operationalizing Democracy through Better Accountability

Halachmi, Arie, Holzer, Marc, Public Administration Quarterly


The purpose of this article is to examine the concept of citizen participation in the context of the interface between the public and government, accountability and the governance process. We assert that greater involvement of citizens in designing the collection, the analysis, the dissemination, and the proper consumption of performance measurement data is a promising strategy for enhancing two important aspects of governance, namely accountability and taxpayers' satisfaction. Genuine, as different from symbolic, citizen participation, we avow, is a valuable tool for increasing trust in a government for two reasons. First, it can provide government planners and program managers a true and accurate data about taxpayers' priorities and preferences between highly desired but mutually exclusive courses of action (Tompkins, Herian and Hoppe 2010). Second, such involvement can provide program managers with important feedback about ongoing operations while boosting the credibility of government's reports about various aspects of its operations. This assertion is consistent with the recent proposal of Aghion, Algan, Cahuc and Shleifer (2008) that unilateral government regulation, to the extent that it constrains productivity, is strongly and negatively correlated with the creation of social capital. According to that proposal, "the correlation works for a range of measures of social capital, from trust in others to trust in corporations and political institutions, as well as for a range of measures of regulation, from product markets to labor markets to judicial procedures."

Citizen participation is seen in this paper as a promising way of cultivating social capital, in the broad sense, given the declining cost and new opportunities for such involvement as a result of developments in information technology in general and interactive forms of e-government in particular. As noted by Kim and Kim (2010: 87), "e-government can positively increase process-based trust by improving interactions with citizens and their perceptions of responsiveness.

The paper starts by placing the need for citizen participation in the current reality of growing demands for accountability. As documented by several publications (Whiteley and Sanders 2005; Global Forum 1999) this reality is articulated through questions by taxpayers and the media about government priorities and the procedures used to attain its various objectives. The paper goes on to discuss the functional aspects of citizen participation as a mean to increase trust, transparency and the quality of data used to make decisions about service levels, procedures and priorities. The paper concludes that with citizen participation it is possible not only to expand on the 1960's slogan "maximum feasible participation" for a more democratic governance process, but to affect government productivity, citizens' satisfaction, transparency and trust in government.



The notion that citizen participation is an important element of the democratic governance process is not new. A case for it was argued with the slogan from the 1960's Maximum Feasible Participation (Moynihan 1969; Rubin 1969). Yet, it should be noted that its wide use in America during the 1960's and 1970's was meant mainly to foster true democracy. For all practical purposes, it was geared to facilitate participation by the poor and minorities that have been left out of the governance process. To be sure, citizen participation was not intended primarily for fostering productivity, better government or accountability. The academics writings on citizen participation during the Johnson Administration (e.g., Strange 1972) coincided with the research interest about agenda setting (e.g., Bachrach and Baratz 1962) and community power (e.g., Hunter 1969). This "coincidence" supports our assertion that at that time citizen participation was used more for operationalizing the concept of greater democracy through a more inclusive participation in the decision making process than as a way of addressing issues of accountability, responsiveness, and public sector productivity.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Citizen Participation and Performance Measurement: Operationalizing Democracy through Better Accountability


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?