A Response to James Pollock's: Choosing the Best Canadian Poetry

By Sutherland, Fraser | Literary Review of Canada, May 2009 | Go to article overview

A Response to James Pollock's: Choosing the Best Canadian Poetry


Sutherland, Fraser, Literary Review of Canada


I HEARTILY CONCUR WITH MANY POINTS THAT James Pollock makes. Canadian poetry desperately needs more reviews and reviewers. As an "attempt to formulate a canon of English-Canadian poetry for the common reader" Margaret Atwood's New Oxford Book of Canadian Verse in English appeared in 1982, to which one might add Ralph Gustafson's Penguin Book of Canadian Verse, which came out in 1984 and is now equally mildewed. The absence of recast, revised or updated survey anthologies not only defeats critical re-evaluation and cheats successive generations of poets; it also consigns poetry to the spurious present. We can't know who we are until we know where we came from.

Pollock observes that "a very few clear-eyed poet-critics are out there," including Carmine Starnino. At times I find Starnino wrongheaded, but wrongheadedness is a reviewer's privilege. What is important is that reviewers should be wrongheaded in varied ways. As Pollock suggests, critical conflict is essential: consensus can only occur over a long period of time. In any case, candid poet-reviewers show some regard for the world around them and have not disappeared down the rabbit hole of their own solipsism.

I am not as sanguine as Pollock about the excellence of current Canadian poetry. But it is certainly true that an arts council-subsidized conveyer belt dumps a production line of books into a reviewing void. I am not as jaundiced as he is about "the poetry of so much of Atwood's celebrated generation, many of whose poets turned against rhetoric and conscious craft with a vengeance." AI Purdy? John Newlove? Gwendolyn MacEwen? Pollock's tastes appear to lean toward the formalist, although I would caution that craftsmanship is no guarantee of great, or even particularly good, poetry. From time to time poetry needs a Whitman to shake it up.

The practice of poetry, like that of any other art, is both democratic and elitist. Democratic, in that anyone is, or should be, free to attempt it. Elitist, in that the better prevails, or ought to, over the bad, and that there are ways of knowing the difference between them. Intelligent popular criticism, unshackled by peer review and academic convention, is one of the chief means.

Let's briefly scan the contemporary evaluative scene, the shrinkage or disappearance of review sections in newspapers, and indeed of newspapers themselves, continues apace though, truth to tell, poetry reviews have never ranked high as a journalistic priority. Among quarterlies, the University of Toronto Quarterly annually dribbles out an overview of the past year's new books. Canadian Literature has fallen far from the days when George Woodcock made it a flexible and open-minded journal. Books in Canada is either moribund or, given its years of mismanagement, deservedly extinct. A dismal landscape, though not devoid of cloud breaks. In Windsor, the pages of CNQ (the rejuvenated Canadian Notes & Queries) offer some hope. In Ottawa, the poetry journal Arc gives reviewing prominence in somewhat the same way as, in the United States, Poetry (Chicago) has revived itself with its reviews and letters sections.

Some general features of literary culture are at best indifferent, if not actively discouraging, to evaluation. The $50,000 Griffin Prize promises a monetary reward beyond poets' dreams of avarice, but prize winning has little to do with genuine public engagement of a poet's work. Public readings flatter the poet's vanity--and ego stroking is often all the reward most poets can expect after years of effort--but infrequently provide more than the sound of one hand clapping. Workshops provide mutual moral support and networking advantages, but seldom result in manifestos or movements, which are other ways in which dialogue can occur.

One might think that, unhampered by space constraints and printers' bills, publishers on the World Wide Web would compensate for the shortfall of reviews in print. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Response to James Pollock's: Choosing the Best Canadian Poetry
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.