Error Prediction in Acquired Apraxia of Speech

By Marquardt, Thomas P.; Schneider, Holly G. et al. | Journal of Medical Speech - Language Pathology, December 2010 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Error Prediction in Acquired Apraxia of Speech


Marquardt, Thomas P., Schneider, Holly G., Jacks, Adam, Journal of Medical Speech - Language Pathology


Six participants with acquired apraxia of speech predicted whether or not they would produce correctly 180 words that varied from one to three or more syllables in length and from low to high abstractness. Participants predicted they would produce very few errors (6.3%), but produced a much higher number (27%). Accuracy of predicted errors also was very low, with only two participants correctly predicting more than 10% of their errors. Error analysis revealed that participants consistently produced more errors as a function of both increasing syllable length and word abstractness. However, a contrasting pattern was found in the error prediction results. Participants predicted more errors as a function of increased word abstractness, but not as a function of word length. Results suggest, that speakers with apraxia have limited knowledge of motor complexity factors, such as word length, that affect speech production.

Keywords: apraxia of speech; speech sound errors; motor complexity; word abstractness

INTRODUCTION

Apraxia of speech (AOS) results from damage to neural circuits of the frontal lobe that are responsible for programming speech movements. AOS is characterized by inefficient translation of intact phonological representations into spatiotemporal parameters of articulatory movements (McNeil, Robin, & Schmidt, 2008). Speech production in AOS is marked by articulatory distortions, lengthened speech segment and intersegment durations, and prosodic abnormality (Wambaugh, Duffy, McNeil, Robin, & Rogers, 2006).

Speech errors in apraxia are affected by motor complexity, with increased numbers of errors expected on longer compared to shorter words and on consonant clusters compared to singleton consonants (e.g., Duffy, 2005; Johns & Darley, 1970; Wertz, LaPointe, & Rosenbek, 1984). The ability of speakers with apraxia to predict errors as a function of motor and linguistic factors, however, has received very limited research interest. Deal and Darley (1972) investigated the ability of 12 participants with AOS to predict speech errors. They found a significant correlation between prediction and production of words. However, two of the participants could not predict any errors, three were able to predict less than 50% of their errors, and four produced 50% more errors than they predicted. Impaired prediction of errors in speakers with AOS suggests that damage to the neural circuitry encoding motor programs for speech affects not only production of speech movements but also judgments related to them.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of speakers with apraxia to predict speech errors as a function of word length and word abstractness.

METHOD

Participants

Six adults with apraxia of speech and mild Broca's aphasia secondary to left frontal brain damage participated in the study (Table 1). Included were three males and three females at least six months post onset of brain damage. The diagnosis of apraxia of speech with mild Broca's aphasia was based on the administration of a standard aphasia battery (e.g., Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination, 2nd Edition, Goodglass & Kaplan, 1983) and a motor speech examination. The participants demonstrated impaired prosody, dysfluent verbal expression, inconsistent segmental errors and minimal auditory comprehension deficits. The diagnosis of apraxia of speech was confirmed by two speech-language pathologists based on review of the clinical evaluation results and observation of the participant in conversation.

TABLE 1. Participant Demographic Data.

Participant  Gender  Age  Etiology  Post-Onset  Lesion Site
                                    (Years)

1              F     59   CVA            4      Left parietal

2              F     70   CVA            5      Left basal ganglia

3              M     43   Gunshot       22      Left frontal/temp.

4              M     45   CVA            3      Left frontal

5              F     53   CVA           12      Left frontal

6              M     64   CVA            6      Left basal
                                               ganglia/thalamus

Stimuli

A total of 180 nouns varying from one to five syllables in length were used as stimuli for the study.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Error Prediction in Acquired Apraxia of Speech
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?