Tax on Coal in Nation's Stocking; New Greenhouse Rules Do Nothing but Unravel Red Tape

The Washington Times (Washington, DC), December 16, 2010 | Go to article overview

Tax on Coal in Nation's Stocking; New Greenhouse Rules Do Nothing but Unravel Red Tape


Byline: Steve Milloy, SPECIAL TO THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Last Friday's federal appellate court decision allowing the Obama administration's greenhouse-gas regulations to take effect Jan. 2 is an unnecessary travesty for taxpayers, consumers, businesses and states.

The ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit isn't the final word on whether the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's rules are legal, but it allows them to take effect pending their litigation.

The court (Clinton appointee David Tatel, Bush appointee Janice Rogers Brown and former-dope-smoking Reagan appointee Douglas Ginsburg presiding) held that the industries challenging the rules failed to show that the harms they allege are certain, rather than speculative, or that the alleged harm[s] will directly result from [the EPA's regulations].

This is ridiculous.

In a few weeks, the EPA will start writing permits for power plants and other large emitters. Overlooking for the moment the costs and hassles to emitters and consumers that will undoubtedly be caused by the rules, at the very least this permit-writing process will cost the EPA and state permitting authorities (read already strapped taxpayers ) about $80 million per year.

What environmental benefits will be gained by these expenditures? You don't have to be a global-warming skeptic to respond: None.

Under the Clean Air Act, if the EPA decides to regulate a pollutant, then it must use the so-called best available control technology (BACT) to reduce emissions - but there is no BACT for greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide (CO2).

Burying CO2 underground - so-called carbon capture and sequestration - is experimental, and not considered BACT. The Obama EPA would love to declare natural gas as BACT for electric-power generation, but it is not yet willing to escalate its war against the coal industry.

Since there is no commercially available technology to reduce CO2 emissions from smokestacks, little will be avoided - even the EPA acknowledges that.

So at a very minimum, Judges Brown, Tatel and Ginsburg have imposed huge costs on taxpayers for precisely nothing in return. Apparently, there is nothing quite like a lifetime appointment away from reality.

But the wasted $80 million is really only the tip of the iceberg. There remain a number of ways that the EPA's rules can cause further harm, according to environmental consultant Rich Trzupek.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Tax on Coal in Nation's Stocking; New Greenhouse Rules Do Nothing but Unravel Red Tape
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.