Ivan Rand's Ancient Constitutionalism

By Penney, Jonathon W. | University of New Brunswick Law Journal, December 2010 | Go to article overview

Ivan Rand's Ancient Constitutionalism


Penney, Jonathon W., University of New Brunswick Law Journal


I. INTRODUCTION

Few names loom larger in the history of Canadian law than Ivan Rand. The late Supreme Court of Canada Justice, law dean, lawyer, politician, and Royal Commissioner was, according to E. M. Pollock's 1979 biographical piece, "destined for greatness". (1) Even today, the judicial work of "one of the greatest--if not the greatest--jurists in Canadian history" (2) remains required reading in law schools; and many of his most important decisions retain a central place in the minds of judges and legal commentators. For example, his judgments in the so-called "Implied Bill of Rights" cases were called the Supreme Court of Canada's "most distinguished achievements," (3) "the 'golden' moments of the civil liberties decade" (4) and the theory of implied rights described as "valuable", (5) "one of the most original and provocative contributions ever made to Canadian constitutional law" (6) with Rand's Court "ahead of their time." (7) If anything, Justice Rand has retained his image as a courageous judge with deep "moral convictions", (8) willing to bend the law in creative ways to seek justice and protect the rights of oppressed minorities, like the Jehovah Witnesses under Quebec's nationalist and reactionary regime of Maurice Duplessis. (9)

But Justice Rand's legal philosophy has not faired as well. Over the years, his theory of "implied rights" has received harsh criticism from prominent critics (10) and, in particular, his ideas about the role of the judiciary and rights adjudication have been called "muddled" (11), "difficult", (12) "contradictory", (13) even "abstruse" (14). How could this be? How could this "giant of a man intellectually" (15) known for the "brilliance of his record on the Bench" (16) offer such problematic, allegedly mediocre, (17) legal thought? Some explanations--that Justice Rand's personal philosophy was "hopelessly equivocal" (18) or that he tried, without success, to "combine and recite traditional doctrines of liberal thinking" (19)--leave much to be desired. Andree Lajoie, whose thoughtful account also tried to come to terms with these problems, first put Justice Rand as a proponent of the Harvard school of sociological jurisprudence (advanced by the likes of Roscoe Pound and others in the 1950s), only to accuse Rand of base "social engineering" while decrying the "lack of research" concerning ideas underlying implied rights. (20)

The central aim of this article is to challenge such assumptions about Justice Rand's work. I want to resolve some of these lingering questions and puzzles by reconstructing an overlooked component of his legal thought: a form of customary, or "ancient" constitutionalism, derived from, and very much akin to, the kind of ideas advanced by early common lawyers like Sir Edward Coke. Rand's thinking was not mired in centuries past; but his knowledge of, and appeal to, these ideas, as important precursors to modern notions of fundamental law, can help explain some of the inconsistencies and controversies apparent in his work. Ultimately, my argument will serve to rehabilitate aspects of Justice Rand's legal thought, while providing a window into the minds of scholars and critics who have ignored this aspect of his writings.

The first section describes an ongoing controversy and puzzle concerning the scope of Justice Rand's concept of implied rights: could they bind both provincial and federal legislatures? Many scholars have concluded that Justice Rand never meant implied rights to bind Parliament, only provincial legislatures, thus acting as a form of policing tool for the division of powers. I offer evidence that this conclusion is wrong. This raises a further nagging question: how could Justice Rand believe this? How could he think a system based on the British constitutional principle of parliamentary sovereignty could include implied rights that limit that sovereignty? The answer is that ideas associated with "ancient constitutionalism" underlay Justice Rand's notion of unwritten and implied rights, a school of thought based on the premise that certain liberties and customs were, by their original and ancient character, beyond the power of either the executive or, arguably, even Parliament to limit or control. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Ivan Rand's Ancient Constitutionalism
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.