Constructing a New American Constitution

By Whittington, Keith E. | Constitutional Commentary, Fall 2010 | Go to article overview

Constructing a New American Constitution


Whittington, Keith E., Constitutional Commentary


Problems of constitutional interpretation have occupied a prominent part of the scholarly agenda for quite some time, and rightly so. Theories of constitutional interpretation help guide and legitimate the work of the judiciary. They grapple directly with what the courts say they do and with many of the issues that lawyers routinely face. Understanding what should be interpreted, how it should be interpreted, and who has the authority to interpret are all important and basic to the constitutional enterprise. (1)

Interpretation is not all that we do with constitutions, however. Interpretive practice is supplemented through a process of constitutional construction. Constitutional scholarship has given increasing attention to the idea of construction as a feature of the constitutional enterprise that is distinct from interpretation and that is worthy of analysis in its own right.

In this Article, I reintroduce the concept, clarify a couple of features of the idea of constitutional constructions as I understand it, and suggest some possible benefits of constructions as a conceptual tool. The Article proceeds first by discussing what constitutional construction is and how it relates to constitutional interpretation. Part II considers the extent to which courts engage in constitutional constructions. Part III considers whether it is possible to avoid constitutional constructions. The Article concludes by suggesting ways in which the concept can be useful to various scholarly literatures.

I. WHAT IS A CONSTITUTIONAL CONSTRUCTION?

Constitutional construction is one mechanism by which constitutional meaning is elaborated. It works alongside constitutional interpretation to elaborate the existing constitutional order. The process of constitutional construction is concerned with fleshing out constitutional principles, practices and rules that are not visible on the face of the constitutional text and that are not readily implicit in the terms of the constitution.

We can imagine a continuum of actions that political actors can take under a Constitution, ranging from policymaking to revolution. At one end of the continuum, political actors can take constitutional forms as a given and make policy decisions under it, filling government offices and exercising government power in (constitutionally) noncontroversial ways. Policymaking seeks to exercise constitutional authority, and its implications for elaborating or altering constitutional meaning are only implicit. At the other end of the spectrum, political actors can engage in revolution and replace the existing constitutional order or document wholesale in favor of a new one. The Articles of Confederation can be displaced in favor of the U.S. Constitution. Less extreme than revolution is creation, which adds new text to a preexisting Constitution. Creation embraces a revisionary authority, but the revisions are partial rather than total. They amend and reform the Constitution, rather than throw it over. (2)

Interpretation and construction are both concerned with elaborating, developing and effectuating the preexisting Constitution. Unlike the mere policymaker, the interpreter or constructor engages the Constitution directly and attempts to address and resolve contested claims about constitutional meaning. But political actors engaged in these tasks do not claim the authority to revise, amend or alter the Constitution. They claim only the lesser authority of attempting to understand and realize the Constitution as they found it.

Construction lies closer along the continuum to the process of creation, however. Construction picks up where interpretation leaves off. Interpretation attempts to divine the meaning of the text. (3) There will be occasions, however, when the Constitution as written cannot in good faith be said to provide a determinate answer to a given question. This is the realm of construction. The process of interpretation may be able to constrain the available readings of the text and limit the permissible set of political options, but the interpreter may not be able to say that the text demands a specific result. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Constructing a New American Constitution
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.