The Art of Censorship: Catholic League, Congressional Allies Push 'Sacrilegious' Video from National Portrait Gallery

By Boston, Rob | Church & State, January 2011 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Art of Censorship: Catholic League, Congressional Allies Push 'Sacrilegious' Video from National Portrait Gallery

Boston, Rob, Church & State

Sometime around 1800, Spanish painter Francisco Jose de Goya completed what is considered one of his greatest works: "The Naked Maja" depicts a young woman, completely nude, reclining on a couch.

The Spanish Inquisition was not impressed with Goya's effort. In 1815, Roman Catholic clergy representing the Inquisition - it existed until 1834 - summoned the painter and demanded to know who had commissioned this work, which they labeled "obscene." Not long after that, Goya lost his position as official painter to the Spanish court.

It's not known what Goya told the Inquisition, but history vindicated the artist. Today "The Naked Maja" is on display at the Museo del Prado in Madrid and is considered a national treasure.

The battle over Goya's painting wasn't the first skirmish between religion and the world of art, and it certainly won't be the last. The truth is, religiously based censorship by the government has a long history in Europe and the United States - and, thanks to recent political changes, it may be on the upswing here.

Religious Right activists, feeling emboldened by their successes in the November elections, are on the prowl against "obscene" or "blasphemous" art, especially in tax-funded museums.

In December, they scored a major win when the National Portrait Gallery in Washington, D.C., agreed to remove a brief video that had been attacked as "sacrilegious" by the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights and other far-right groups.

The video in question was part of a larger exhibit called "Hide/Seek: Difference and Desire in American Portraiture," which explores questions of gender identity in American history through art. The exhibit contains works by several artists, including Georgia O'Keeffe, David Hockney, Jasper Johns and Andy Warhol.

The controversial video is by the late David Wojnarowicz, a performance artist who worked in several media. Titled "Fire in My Belly," it is about four minutes long and includes an 11-second segment that shows ants crawling on a crucifix.

Some art critics believed that Wojnarowicz, who died of AIDS in 1992, was making a statement about the suffering of those who have the disease, but Wendy Olsoff, a gallery owner in New York City who represents Wojnarowicz's estate, said the artist viewed ants as a microcosm of human society and often showed them in his work crawling on lots of different objects.

"It was not about Christ," Olsoff told The Washington Post. "It was just about institutionalized religion."

Nevertheless, the Smithsonian yanked the entire video after House Speaker John Boehner and Majority Leader Eric Cantor attacked the work.

"American families have a right to expect better from recipients of taxpayer funds in a tough economy," Kevin Smith, a spokesman for Boehner, told The Post. "While the amount of money involved may be small, it's symbolic of the arrogance Washington routinely applies to thousands of spending decisions involving Americans' hard-earned money."

Cantor went a step further, demanding that the entire exhibit be shut down. He called it an "outrageous use of taxpayer money and an obvious attempt to offend Christians during the Christmas season."

Perhaps hoping to spark his own inquisition of the medieval variety, U.S. Rep. Jack Kingston (R-Ga.) a day later upped the ante, insisting that Congress launch an official investigation into the matter.

Americans United for Separation of Church and State had a different take on the controversy.

"Boehner and Cantor aren't even in control of the House yet, and already they're kowtowing to the Religious Right," said Barry W Lynn, executive director of Americans United. "This is religiously based censorship, pure and simple - and it's reprehensible.

"If some people believe a show like this offends their religious sensibilities, the answer is for them not to go to it," Lynn added.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Art of Censorship: Catholic League, Congressional Allies Push 'Sacrilegious' Video from National Portrait Gallery


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?