WATERCOLOUR WONDERS; the Bigger of Two New Exhibitions Devoted to Watercolour Demonstrates the Beauty of the Art as Much as It Clouds the Picture with Naive Enthusiasm for the Craft; WATERCOLOUR Tate Britain, SW1; VICTORIAN DRAWINGS AND WATERCOLOURS Courtauld Gallery, WC2

The Evening Standard (London, England), February 24, 2011 | Go to article overview

WATERCOLOUR WONDERS; the Bigger of Two New Exhibitions Devoted to Watercolour Demonstrates the Beauty of the Art as Much as It Clouds the Picture with Naive Enthusiasm for the Craft; WATERCOLOUR Tate Britain, SW1; VICTORIAN DRAWINGS AND WATERCOLOURS Courtauld Gallery, WC2


Byline: Brian Sewell

UNUSUALLY well-lit (mercifully too), there are now in Tate Britain's subterranean gallery some wonderful watercolours, ranging over the three centuries that separate Anthony Van Dyck in c.1640 from Edward Burra in 1941. Let us imagine Van Dyck on the hill at Greenwich, looking north over the higgledy-piggledy buildings on the river's bank, to the tall sailing ships tugged hither and yon by the breeze that is gentler with the forest trees that almost block his view. In Greenwich to paint the Queen, or perhaps Inigo Jones, whose about-to-be finished house for her is out of sight to the left, he has broken away to ease his consumptive lungs with fresh air from the east. Let us imagine, too, the rheumatic crumpled Burra, demonic, sardonic and malevolent, discovering in the Dad's Army of Rye in 1941 the buttocks of the ballet dancer, the strut of a Harlem cock-o'-the-walk, and Cocteau's haze of opiates.

Van Dyck's swift true note of a landscape that might, reorganised, find its way into the background of a portrait, is a small thing of morning's light, shadow and atmosphere, a view come upon by chance, not compositionally adjusted but recorded as it was, intentional only in that he had with him his pen and ink, brush and colours, and a phial of water. I can imagine him cleaning and re-forming that brush by putting it in his mouth and withdrawing it through pursed lips. Burra too did this for details, but not for his broad areas of colour -- these were achieved with fat soft sable brushes, No12, capable of holding half a cubic centimetre of wash -- but in all other aspects of Soldiers at Rye, he could hardly be further from Van Dyck. His watercolour is 80 inches from side to side, Van Dyck's is 10; Van Dyck's is informal and private, Burra's formal and intended for an audience, with nothing left to chance or accident, a composition that is punctiliously elaborate, flawlessly conceived and beyond immediate understanding, menacing, portentous, grotesque and decadent; Van Dyck's is a scratch of the pen and the careless dab of the brush, Burra's a thing of great technical control, the layers of wash on absorbent paper translucent, yet deep, rich and intense, the apotheosis of the medium.

Between them, Van Dyck and Burra demonstrate all that needs to be said of watercolour, from the privy note in a sketchbook to the terribilita of fierce emotion, sex, war and ritual, designed in subject, scale and colour to trump any oil painting its neighbour in the greatest of exhibitions.

The same claim of rivalry with oil painting can be made for Samuel Palmer's Dream in the Apennine of 1864; both as a homage to the golden syrup sunsets of Claude, the most influential of 17th-century landscape painters, and as a challenge for Turner's place as the most dominant of the 19th, at least as the greatest living painter of large watercolours.

Where Turner in The Blue Rigi at Sunrise, of 1842, at home in his studio seems to have breathed the rememother bered dawn onto his paper, Palmer made his watercolour take on something of the substance of oil paint by enlisting gouache (opaque body colour), varnish and gum -- yet still the white of the paper lends a blinding glare to the light of the setting sun. In another "exhibition" watercolour the forgotten George Fennel Robson took a more classical technical approach, his watercolour pure, yet, against the dying light, the darkness of the Cuchulin mountains in his Loch Coruisk, on Skye of 1826, has, layer over layer, the intensity of velvet. Robson refers to the rocks and crags of Salvator Rosa with banditti in a Highland plaid, but his composition is more orderly, drama suppressed, Romanticism deflated; it is, nevertheless, compelling if one has one's nose in it -- note the scratching-out of dribbling snow in the top left corner. In comparison the Sturm und Drang of Turner's imagined Battle of Fort Rock, painted a decade earlier, looks rather silly, forced, unconvincing and even a shade off-colour; is it, perhaps, a little grubby, even a little faded?

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

WATERCOLOUR WONDERS; the Bigger of Two New Exhibitions Devoted to Watercolour Demonstrates the Beauty of the Art as Much as It Clouds the Picture with Naive Enthusiasm for the Craft; WATERCOLOUR Tate Britain, SW1; VICTORIAN DRAWINGS AND WATERCOLOURS Courtauld Gallery, WC2
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.