The Third Axiom, or a Logic of Liberty: On the Structure of Ethics and Economics as One Unified Aprioristic Science

By Preusse, Peter J. | Libertarian Papers, January 2010 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Third Axiom, or a Logic of Liberty: On the Structure of Ethics and Economics as One Unified Aprioristic Science

Preusse, Peter J., Libertarian Papers

1. Introduction: Liberty, What Is It?

The misery of essentialism in his time, or at least of the philosophy of liberty, is condensed by Popper into a remarkable summary: "Scholasticism, mysticism and despair of reason--these are the inevitable outcomes of Platonic and Aristotelian essentialism. And Aristotle turns Plato's overt revolt against liberty into a larvate rebellion against reason." (1)

On occasions, Hegel takes liberty to mean "truth of necessity", and this in turn was coined by Engels into the dictum "insight into necessity." In a different context, liberty appears to Hegel as a Christian "principle of self-consciousness," then it is "liberty in itself, including the indefinite necessity to come to cognition--for it is, by its term, knowledge of itself--and thereupon to reality." (2) Popper closes his listing of Hegelian terms of freedom with the succinct remark: "And so forth."

Yet, in a chapter with the beautiful title "The Twistable is Not Testable," de Jasay (3) points out, from a libertarian point of view, the absurd inconsistencies Popper entangles himself in by trying to reconcile liberty and democracy using a "social technology ... whose results can be evaluated by stepwise solution-finding." (4) An immortal criticism of essentialist exegesis of liberty stems from Albert Jay Nock: "Anything may be made to mean anything." (5)

De Jasay clearly illuminates the consequences of a hodgepodge of terms--for example, liberty, sociality and justice: "It is just that a person should be allowed to keep what he (6) has if, and only if, more people than not think that he should." (7) This principle translates into: the freedom to think this or that defines the just share of social wealth. In the chapter "Justice as Something Else," de Jasay surveys such camouflage identities of justice: Justice as universalizability (8) by Kant, as fairness of initial equality behind a hypothetical veil of ignorance by John Rawls, as unrejectability by Thomas Scanlon, and as impartiality by Brian Berry. What all have in common is the view that justice is a matter of social choice.

A more distinct, and far clearer, understanding of the term liberty has been reached in the liberal and libertarian traditions. In particular, Friedrich August von Hayek, in recourse to Aristotle (9) and more recent concepts of liberty, defines liberty in a negative way, as a state "in which a man is not subject to arbitrary coercion by the will of another or others." (10) This negative definition of liberty is already enunciated in the ingenious first footnote in the cited work, stating that, as opposed to "freedom," the word "liberty" better resists abuse--e.g., in Franklin Roosevelt's principle of "freedom from want."

The concept of liberty finds its solid foundation in praxeology, Ludwig von Mises's term with reference to Espinas, 1887, (11) for his aprioristic-deductive "general theory of human action." He rejects the idealistic concept of an ideal and freely living primitive society following a religious and pseudo-religious pattern of paradise; instead, he states that man is not born free, but that "liberty and freedom [?] are the conditions of man within a contractual [as opposed to a power-based] society." (12)

The outstanding 20th century thinker of liberty, Murray Newton Rothbard, has pinpointed the issue of liberty as an end: "Liberty is a moral principle, grounded on the nature of man. In particular, it is a principle of justice, of the abolition of aggressive violence in the affairs of men.... Justice, not the weak reed of mere utility, must be the motivating force if liberty is to be attained." (13)

Justice as a libertarian concept deals exclusively with contracts, and the enforcement of contracts, based on free consent--that is, never with concern for the contents and outcome of such contracts, but only with ensuring their free, i.e., noncoercive, origin.

   It is not the intention of this book [The Ethics of Liberty] to
   expound or defend at length the philosophy of natural law, or to
   elaborate a natural law ethic for the personal morality of man. 

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Third Axiom, or a Logic of Liberty: On the Structure of Ethics and Economics as One Unified Aprioristic Science


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?