Subsidiary Interdependencies and International Human Resource Management Practices in German MNCs: A Resource-Based View

By Holtbrugge, Dirk; Mohr, Alex T. | Management International Review, January 2011 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Subsidiary Interdependencies and International Human Resource Management Practices in German MNCs: A Resource-Based View


Holtbrugge, Dirk, Mohr, Alex T., Management International Review


Abstract:

* Using the resource-based view, this paper links the degree of interdependence that exists between subsidiaries of multinational corporations (MNCs) to the use of various International Human Resource Management (IHRM) practices.

* We assume that in many MNCs this interdependence has increased the need for cross-border coordination.

* We analyze to what extent MNCs use IHRM practices in order to enhance their coordination capability across national borders.

* We present a framework that addresses these effects and empirically test it using data from a questionnaire survey among 142 majority-owned overseas subsidiaries of German MNCs.

* The findings show that the degree of interdependence is related to the level of international experience of staff employed in subsidiaries, the use of third-country nationals, the provision of training, the use of cross-cultural management teams, and the choice of employee evaluation and reward methods.

* We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings for IHRM practitioners and scholars as well as the limitations of our study.

Keywords: International human resource management- Resource-based view. Transnational networks. Expatriates. Global teams. Intercultural training. Remuneration

Introduction

Multinational Corporations (MNCs) can no longer limit their attention to merely managing the growth of foreign activities. They also have to cope with rapidly changing economic, competitive, legal, political, and cultural conditions in the environments they operate in (Birkinshaw 2001; Doz and Prahalad 2005). Research on global strategic management has suggested a number of strategic options for MNCs that are characterized by differing degrees of global coordination or integration and local responsiveness. According to Bartlett and Ghoshal (2002), strategies that focus on only one of these dimensions, such as the global strategy (high coordination, low local responsiveness) or the multinational strategy (low coordination, high local responsiveness), are no longer adequate for maintaining or achieving global competitiveness, given the changes in technology, government policies and consumer preferences. Instead, they suggest that MNCs need to follow a transnational strategy in which MNCs not only try to achieve high levels of global coordination and local responsiveness at the same time, but also high levels of worldwide learning and knowledge transfer. Other authors have suggested similar models to replace the traditional uni-dimensional models of MNCs. These models include, for example, the 'differentiated network' (Nohria and Ghoshal 1997), the 'heterarchy' (Hedlund and Rolander 1990) or the 'metanational corporation' (Doz et al. 2001). Despite some differences in detail, the key idea of these concepts is the simultaneous exploitation of three main sources of competitive advantage: economies of scale, economies of scope, and arbitrage opportunities (Ghoshal 1987).

According to Bartlett and Ghoshal (2002), the implementation of a transnational strategy requires MNCs to establish an integrated transnational network. From a network perspective, subsidiaries are regarded as differentiated but integrated elements of a complex configuration of value creating activities across national borders (Porter 1986). They are differentiated in as far as not all subsidiaries need to carry out the full range of value-adding activities of the MNC, have the same resource configuration and competences, or produce/sell identical services or products (Ghoshal and Bartlett 2005). However, instead of being merely responsible for their position in their respective market, subsidiaries have to contribute to improving the performance of the MNC as a whole (e.g., Rosenzweig 2006). While the associated increase in the interdependence among subsidiaries as well as between them and the headquarters is a "key to competitive advantage" (Kostova and Roth 2003, p.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Subsidiary Interdependencies and International Human Resource Management Practices in German MNCs: A Resource-Based View
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?