From Spectator to "Differentiated" Consumer: Film Audience Research in the Era of Developed Socialism (1965-80)

By First, Joshua | Kritika, Spring 2008 | Go to article overview

From Spectator to "Differentiated" Consumer: Film Audience Research in the Era of Developed Socialism (1965-80)


First, Joshua, Kritika


In 1980, the Gor'kii film studio in Moscow released Piraty XX veka (Pirates of the 20th Century), which became the highest-grossing domestic film in Soviet history with over 85 million tickets sold in that year alone. (1) The film's plot, simultaneously simple and entirely unique for Soviet cinema, concerns a group of patriotic sailors experienced in martial arts who defeat a band of AK-47-toting pirates, one of whom also holds a black belt in karate. While audiences and film distribution authorities warmly received Pirates, the film's supposed lack of character development and absence of classical narrative structure appalled critics, who claimed its popularity represented Soviet spectators' lack of taste. The director Boris Durov defended his film, saying, "I feel that the audience wants to see spectacle. A contemporary film about pirates [eases] melancholic [feelings] with romance and adventure." (2) Vladimir Ishimov, a Soviet film critic relatively sympathetic to the film, commented that its creators "understand well the rules of audience perception prevailing in our country, and consequently all the picture's components are strictly measured." (3) This puzzling statement raises several questions, not the least of which include what produced this type of knowledge about audience perception and where such "measurements" were available.

Eight years later, Stanislav Govorukhin, the film's screenwriter and first secretary of the Odessa branch of the Cinematographers Union, opened the proceedings for the first "Golden Duke" film festival, presenting the event as an "alternative" space for producers of popular cinema. The future political documentarist and State Duma member (since 1993) attempted to counteract the newer trend during glasnost" toward experimentation and the melancholy associated with chernukha [dark] films. His speech reads as a legitimating manifesto for what he called the "low" genres. Govorukhin sarcastically labeled them as Soviet cinema's "seven deadly sins," which included comedy, melodrama, musical, detective, adventure, science fiction, and thriller. He later reported in Sovetskaia kul'tura that instead of the usual film critics who presided over the annual all-union film festival and the Moscow international film festival, a "large group of sociologists" were present at the "Odessa alternative." He further stressed the greater need for "contact with the spectator," and the necessity to study viewers' needs, desires, and sympathies/ (4) What did Govorukhin intend with this counterposition of sociology with film criticism? His statement was at once populist, with its predictable anti-intellectualism, and affirming of a different intellectual tradition and particular method of understanding the social work that film does.

Moreover, the article represented Govorukhin's amazing ability to reconstruct the discourse of "cinema and spectator" as it existed in the era of "developed socialism" (1965-85), with its emphasis on gathering "scientific" knowledge about society and its reliance on "objective" technological processes over "subjective" understandings to find meaning in cultural products. (5) "Developed socialism" had less use for the literary or film critic, whose role in Soviet cultural politics was gradually being outmoded by the media sociologist, an individual with a social-science or technical education. Nonetheless, critics at first participated in their own demise, welcoming the "new methods" of sociology for understanding the relationship between media and their consumers. It was only by the mid-1970s that several leading critics began to question the practice of "reducing spectators to statistical averages," which appeared to them as all that sociology had accomplished over the past decade. By this time, however, the sociologist's position had already eclipsed that of the critic, in no small measure owing to the Soviet film industry's greater emphasis on such entertainment films that Govorukhin and Durov had pioneered.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

From Spectator to "Differentiated" Consumer: Film Audience Research in the Era of Developed Socialism (1965-80)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.