Linguistic Ideologies, Economies, and Technologies in the Language Culture of Contemporary Russia (1987-2008)

By Gorham, Michael S. | Journal of Slavic Linguistics, Fall 2009 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Linguistic Ideologies, Economies, and Technologies in the Language Culture of Contemporary Russia (1987-2008)

Gorham, Michael S., Journal of Slavic Linguistics

Abstract: In this article I outline a theoretical and methodological framework for pursing a comprehensive study of the dominant issues and trends of Russian language culture from the Perestroika era through the present day. My chief claim is that the general shape, tone, and trajectory of a language culture will change over time and depend largely on the interdependence of three driving forces: language ideologies, economies, and technologies. To illustrate and substantiate this working hypothesis I examine both secondary theoretical sources and concrete case studies from the language culture of contemporary Russia (1987-2008).

1. Politkonkretnost'

Along with kreativ, it was this term that received the dubious award of "anti-word of the year" (antislovo goda) from a panel of linguists and literary critics appointed to name both the anti-word and word of the year for 2007 (Epshtein 2008). (The honor of "word of the year" went to glamur.) Although a close cousin to politkorrektnost', a derivative of the English "political correctness", it means something quite different (and can be translated literally as 'political concreteness'), more akin to what some believe to have been the very first manifestations of "political correctness", now long forgotten, in Mao's "correct thinking" and the Leninist "correct line-ism" (Suhr and Johnson 2003: 8-9). As Mikhail Epshtein defines the term in his article announcing the awards,

Politkonkretnost' is when, in politics, everything is determined in advance, such as duma elections or the election of the next president. Putin comes out in support of "United Russia", they get a majority, nominate a successor, and everyone votes for him. It can be added that recently the word 'konkretnyj' has acquired broad popularity in such slang expressions as 'konkretnyj pacan' ("real [i.e., 'totally awesome'] lad") [and] 'konkretnyj muzik' ("real bloke").

Who are these politically concrete? Those who have announced themselves, positioned themselves within the framework of the dominant policy. The chair of the election commission, who suggests that "the president cannot be incorrect (a formula of papal infallibility)". Cultural and sports leaders begging the president (out of personal love for him) to violate the constitution. Pedagogues and caregivers organizing a movement of young 'bear cubs' (miski) for the sake of victory for the 'all-bear' cause. You sense the difference: in the West--political correctness, in Russia--political concreteness. (Epshtein 2008) (1)

On a certain level, the English and Russian terms do share a common orientation--one critical of a certain political or social agenda and cognizant of the powerful role of language in establishing and imposing that agenda. (An interesting corollary here is that both terms seem to be deployed chiefly by opponents of the phenomenon they are using it to describe. No self-respecting person would label him or herself "PC" or, presumably, "politkonkretnyj".) But the objects of criticism are quite different: in one case, left intellectuals who are themselves largely marginalized in American culture; in the other, establishment players who belong, or aspire to belong, to dominant power structures. One sees "political correctness" as an illness of an outgroup and threat to established belief systems, the other views politkonkretnost' as a malady of party insiders keen on reinforcing the status quo and thereby buttressing their own claim to its authority. One challenges the status quo, the other seeks to reinforce it. And yet the two do share one assumption central to my work: that language not only reflects but itself shapes perception, identity, reality; that how we name things and call people helps define not only their image and status in society, but our own as well. In their very differences, the two terms also reflect a second important assumption--that language, culture, and politics are closely intertwined and mutually dependent on one another for meaning.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Linguistic Ideologies, Economies, and Technologies in the Language Culture of Contemporary Russia (1987-2008)


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?