European Middle and Upper Palaeolithic Radiocarbon Dates Are Often Older Than They Look: Problems with Previous Dates and Some Remedies

By Higham, Thomas | Antiquity, March 2011 | Go to article overview

European Middle and Upper Palaeolithic Radiocarbon Dates Are Often Older Than They Look: Problems with Previous Dates and Some Remedies


Higham, Thomas, Antiquity


Introduction

The European Middle to Upper Palaeolithic is widely accepted as being the transitional period over which the final Neanderthals became extinct and were replaced by anatomically modern humans (Mellars 1989, 1999; Zilhao & D'Errico 1999; Zilhao 2006 and references therein). Questions of major importance arise. Did Neanderthals independently develop symbolic and adaptive behaviours before the ~36 500 [sup.14]C BP arrival of modern humans in Western Europe? Did they copy incoming modern human behaviour ('acculturation') whilst the two co-existed in the few millennia prior to Neanderthal extinction? Where, when and how did Neanderthals become extinct and how did their extinction relate to the spatial dispersai of modern human populations? Did Neanderthals and modern humans meet, were they contemporaries in some or all parts of Europe, and did they mate?

The resolution of many of these questions awaits an unambiguous and reliable chronology, bur for 50 years, this has been unattainable. Radiocarbon dates exhibit an asymptotic tendency as they approach the measurement limit, which is itself determined in individual laboratories by careful repeat radiocarbon measurements of material known to be beyond the reach of the technique, i.e. greater than about 60 000 or 70 000 years old (Chappell et al. 1996). Subsequent radiocarbon measurements can never be older than this, since if a radiocarbon date is within two standard deviations of the background value, a 'greater than' age is calculated.

Several scholars have attempted to explore the issues using databanks of radiocarbon dates obtained from archaeological sites (e.g. Bocquet-Appel & Demars 2000, bur see Pettitt & Pike 2001; Joris et al. 2003; van Andel et al. 2003; Dolukhanov & Shukurov 2004; Gamble et al. 2004, 2005; Kuzmin & Keates 2005) and received guidance on how best to view the many available dates (Pettitt et al. 2003). But research undertaken by the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU) over the last decade throws doubt on the validity of many of these published dates. The principal areas of error lie in the selection of inappropriate samples and the effects of inadequate pre-treatment to remove contamination. This paper addresses some of the problems and illustrates recent progress and a way forward.

Sample selection

It is clear that many samples dated in the past have failed to pass the basic test of bearing witness to the presence of humans. Types of useful samples include cut-marked or humanly-modified bones, human remains, organic artefacts or charcoal from clearly identified features, such as hearths. It is axiomatic that all of these samples must come from secure archaeological contexts, bur even if they do not, they have the distinct advantage over other types of nondescript bone of still being able to provide information regarding the age of human presence. Samples of bone without cut marks ought to be avoided because they may be deposited by animals such as hyena that regularly use the same types of cave and rockshelter sites frequented by humans. Such problems have been particularly acute in the British Paiaeolithic (Jacobi et al. 2006), but are almost certainly more widely applicable. In some contexts it is exceedingly difficult to identify cut marks, since surface etching, degradation, overprinting by animals and deposits of carbonate and sediment can obscure them. Without careful sample selection, no amount of improved pre-treatment chemistry will result in accurate ages.

Contamination

Samples of Middle/Upper Palaeolithic age are particularly susceptible to errors from contamination. Whilst laboratory and chemical background is quantifiable, however, trace contamination derived from archaeological contexts rarely is. It is this material that may be responsible for producing finite dates for samples that are, in reality, older than the [sup.14]C limit. Historically, this has left us a situation in which we now have many radiocarbon ages that are artificially younger than they ought to be. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

European Middle and Upper Palaeolithic Radiocarbon Dates Are Often Older Than They Look: Problems with Previous Dates and Some Remedies
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.