The United States Department of Defense and the International Health Regulations (2005): Perceptions, Pitfalls and Progress towards Implementation. (Perspectives)

By Johns, Matthew; Blazes, David L. et al. | Bulletin of the World Health Organization, March 2011 | Go to article overview

The United States Department of Defense and the International Health Regulations (2005): Perceptions, Pitfalls and Progress towards Implementation. (Perspectives)


Johns, Matthew, Blazes, David L., Fernandez, Jose, Russell, Kevin, Chen, D. W., Loftis, Robert, Bulletin of the World Health Organization


Background

The Department of Defense of the United States of America (USA) has been conducting respiratory disease surveillance among United States military personnel around the world since the mid-1970s. (1) The Department's Global Emerging Infections System began in 1997 (2) and currently includes nearly 500 sites with partners in 75 countries. The primary focus of the network is the early detection and rapid response to emerging or newly identified viruses of public health concern. (3) The World Health Organization's (WHO's) International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005) form the central guiding framework for both reporting of public health threats and potential public health emergencies of international concern.

In recent years, the Department of Defense network has established disease surveillance in collaboration with host countries and has built a core capacity within each host country for sustained monitoring of respiratory disease activity within their borders. This network has demonstrated the ability to identify and respond quickly to public health emergencies of international concern, as illustrated in the influenza pandemic of 2009-10, and has also provided multiple viral-strain contributions to influenza vaccines over the past decade. (3)

H1N1 pandemic response

In early April of 2009, two Department of Defense laboratories (the Naval Health Research Center in San Diego, California, and the Unites States Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine in San Antonio, Texas) in collaboration with the United States Centers for Disease Control, became the first public health institutions to identify the 2009 novel A/H1N1 influenza pandemic. (4) Between 15 April 2009 and 30 August 2009 (the first wave of the WHO-declared pandemic), the Department of Defense global network of influenza surveillance sites supported 14 host country partners in confirming their first cases of novel influenza A/H1N1. The Department of Defense also identified more than 1000 cases among military personnel or their family members located in 13 countries. Shortly after the onset of the pandemic, the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center began coordinating public health centres and laboratories of the United States' Navy, Army and Air Force to aggressively respond to this new threat among beneficiaries and active duty service members worldwide.

An initial area of concern quickly became identifying the responsible party and appropriate mechanism for reporting laboratory-confirmed cases of novel influenza A/H1N1 among United States military personnel stationed in foreign countries in compliance with the IHR. Interactions between medical units of the United States military and the corresponding host countries' Ministries of Health varied widely based on established formal and informal arrangements, the nature of current missions and the host country's requirements for reporting routine medical events during outbreaks of disease and other public health emergencies. Where a collaborative relationship was established with host country counterparts, reporting of pandemic influenza A/H1N1 cases to the host country Ministry of Health was rather seamless. In cases where a relationship did not exist, and for all individuals overseas who were diagnosed through Department of Defense reference laboratories, cases were reported through the different Department of Defense service public health hubs to the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center. Detailed case lists were then compiled and submitted to the United States Department of Health and Human Services, the designated national focal point for IHR reporting. Reports were then sent by this Department through the WHO regional offices and to the national focal points in the corresponding host country per Articles 6 and 9 of the IHR. In either circumstance, lines of meaningful bilateral communication and coordination were tested and further strengthened.

IHR issues

Two significant issues related to the IHR became rapidly apparent during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The United States Department of Defense and the International Health Regulations (2005): Perceptions, Pitfalls and Progress towards Implementation. (Perspectives)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.