Judicious Influence: Non-Self-Executing Treaties and the Charming Betsy Canon

By Crootof, Rebecca | The Yale Law Journal, May 2011 | Go to article overview

Judicious Influence: Non-Self-Executing Treaties and the Charming Betsy Canon


Crootof, Rebecca, The Yale Law Journal


NOTE CONTENTS

I. HOW NON-SELF-EXECUTING TREATIES INFLUENCE STATUTORY
   INTERPRETATION
   A. The Charming Betsy Canon
   B. The Role of Non-Self-Executing Treaties Describing Customary
      International Law in Statutory Interpretation
   C. The Role of Non-Self-Executing Treaties Describing Treaty
      Commitments in Statutory Interpretation

II. THE CASE FOR EMPLOYING NON-SELF-EXECUTING TREATIES IN
   CONCERT WITH THE CHARMING BETSY CANON
   A. The Immaterial Distinction Between Self- and Non-Self-Executing
      Treaties in Statutory Interpretation
   B. The Charming Betsy Canon's Limited Application Fosters Relatively
      Costless Compliance with International Obligations
   C. The Charming Betsy Canon's Deference to the Political Branches
      Respects Separation-of-Powers Principles
   D. The Charming Betsy Canon Encourages Domestic Courts' Engagement
      with International Agreements and International Adoption of
      Domestic Norms
   E. Critiques of the Canon and Its Application

CONCLUSION

When the United States ratifies a treaty, (1) it accepts and is bound by the treaty's requirements as a matter of international law. (2) Not all of these international obligations, however, may be enforced directly. In the United States, treaties are divided into "self-executing treaties"--which can be immediately enforced in courts (3) and may create private rights of action (4)--and "non-self-executing treaties"--which may not be judicially enforceable or may have no status as domestic law unless Congress passes implementing legislation. (5) In light of this distinction, the political branches often ratify treaties with language identifying them as self- or non-self-executing. When the self-executing status of a treaty is unclear, courts examine its text, its history, and subsequent state practice to determine the parties' intentions. (6)

In Medellin v. Texas, the Supreme Court appeared to endorse the presumption that, unless their text indicates otherwise, treaties are not self-executing. (7) On a practical level, Medellin increases the likelihood that future treaties will include text clarifying whether they are self-executing, (8) but the status of numerous treaties passed without such language remains unclear. (9) The narrowest reading of Medellin in the context of treaty law is that, because the treaties that were at issue were not self-executing, an adverse decision of the International Court of Justice was unenforceable in domestic courts. (10) However, application of the Court's reasoning will likely result in more treaties being deemed non-self-executing, (11) and some lower courts appear to read Medellin as approving the presumption in favor of non-self-execution. (12)

Even before Medellin, non-self-executing treaties were commonly dismissed as ineffectual agreements, (13) and even the most informed and definitive international law texts suggest that such treaties are domestically impotent in the absence of implementing legislation. (14) As non-self-executing treaties, standing alone, are perceived as having little to no effect on domestic jurisprudence, Medellin's seeming new presumption triggered a flurry of commentary in the academic community. (15) Internationalist scholars deplored Medellin's apparent approval of a presumption against self-execution. (16) Meanwhile, given that nationalists had already made an argument for such a presumption, (17) it is unsurprising that they celebrated its endorsement by the Supreme Court. (18)

Both sides missed the essential point. (19) Self-execution is important insofar as it increases the likelihood that a treaty will create a private right of action, but treaties are rarely cited in domestic decisions on that basis. (20) Instead, treaties most often influence domestic jurisprudence indirectly, when used as interpretive tools in conjunction with the Charming Betsy canon. (21) The Charming Betsy canon of statutory interpretation is a rebuttable presumption that, when interpreting an ambiguous domestic statute, a judge should select a reading that accords with U. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Judicious Influence: Non-Self-Executing Treaties and the Charming Betsy Canon
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.