Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Perfectionism and Psychological Adjustment among College Students: Does Educational Context Matter?

By: Hibbard, David R.; Davies, Kyra L. | North American Journal of Psychology, June 2011 | Article details

Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

Perfectionism and Psychological Adjustment among College Students: Does Educational Context Matter?


Hibbard, David R., Davies, Kyra L., North American Journal of Psychology


Perfectionism is generally seen as the "striving for flawlessness" (Flett & Hewitt, 2002, p. 5), and although perfectionism exists among individuals of all ages, perfectionism and its influence on psychological adjustment among college students has not been thoroughly researched. At both the undergraduate and graduate levels, students are under increasing pressure to perform at the highest levels to compete. Information about how perfectionism affects college students can help parents, teachers, counselors, and other higher education professionals who assist these students. Moreover, it is possible that the nature and effects of perfectionism may vary for students attending different types of institutions of higher learning. This study attempts to explore these issues.

Although researchers (e.g., Flett & Hewitt, 2002; Frost, Marten, Lahart, & Rosenblate, 1990) disagree on how exactly to define or conceptualize perfectionism, some researchers have found that a multidimensional approach to studying perfectionism is useful in identifying both adaptive and maladaptive aspects of perfectionism (Flett & Hewitt, 2002; Frost et al., 1990). Early work by Hamachek (1978) distinguished between "normal" perfectionists who have high personal standards but allow themselves some flexibility in self-evaluations, and "neurotic" perfectionists who avoid positive self-evaluations unless their performance is always perfect. Frost et al. (1990) contend that perfectionism is made up of several dimensions, including concerns about making mistakes, high personal standards, doubts about one's actions, and organization. Frost et al. (1990) argue that perceived high parental expectations and parental criticism are also important ingredients of a perfectionistic orientation. If, indeed, there are distinct dimensions of perfectionism, it is important to examine how each of these dimensions is associated with typical markers of psychological adjustment among college students such as self-esteem, depression, eating disorders, and loneliness. For example, it would be useful to clarify whether some aspects of perfectionism (e.g., having high personal standards) are associated with good psychological adjustment, whereas other aspects (e.g., excessive concerns about making mistakes) are associated with poorer adjustment.

Another interesting issue is whether the nature of perfectionism differs depending on the type of student and/or the type of university setting. One possibility is that perfectionistic students tend to be drawn to selective private universities, whereas students who are not perfectionistic tend to be attracted to less selective public universities (or simply get lower grades and have to settle for less elite institutions). On the other hand, it may be that private colleges tend to encourage perfectionism in students (perhaps because of the rigid standards common at these institutions). The high pressure context of a selective private school may breed perfectionism where students feel like they must attain perfection just to meet high standards. In contrast--although standards vary from school to school--less selective public colleges may not foster a perfectionistic orientation to the same degree. It is not clear which, or if any of these possibilities is more likely. Although it is difficult to tease apart the effects of type of college setting from the kind of students who attend the colleges, research that explores the relationship and patterns between perfectionism and psychological adjustment in different types of school environments is necessary to provide a good starting point for further longitudinal research.

Although much research has examined the general patterns of association between perfectionism and psychological adjustment factors, very few studies have compared these patterns in different types of learning environments. For example, consistent links have been found between perfectionism and depressive symptomology (e.g., Hewitt & Flett, 1990), lower self-esteem (e.g., Rice, Ashby, & Slaney, 1998), suicide ideation (e.g., Adkins & Parker, 1996), and eating disorders (e.g., Axtell & Newlon, 1993) among college students, but less is known about the nature of these patterns in distinctly different settings or with different types of students. If some aspects of perfectionism are more adaptive in a particular setting (i.e., a private or a public college), counselors who work with students in these settings can encourage the adaptive characteristics while discouraging (or at least helping students manage) the more maladaptive aspects. If, on the other hand, the nature and effects of perfectionism are similar in both types of college settings, professionals working with students could employ uniform strategies for perfectionistic students in general, regardless of learning context. In short, intervention and support strategies for perfectionistic students may need to vary depending on where they go to school.

There are reasons to suspect that private and public college students may manifest different levels and/or dimensions of perfectionism. For example, research within one institution has shown that high-achieving students (e.g., gifted students or college honors students) manifest a higher level of maladaptive perfectionism than other students (e.g., LoCicero & Ashby, 2000). Other studies, however, show either no differences or contradictory findings when comparing high-achieving students and other students (e.g., Parker, 2000). One possibility that may be relevant to students' educational setting was proposed by Flett and Hewitt (2002), who argued that under stressful conditions, some seemingly adaptive …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?