Questions That Still Demand an Answer

Daily Mail (London), June 10, 2011 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Questions That Still Demand an Answer

Byline: Sue Reid

Since Dr David Kelly's death in 2003, the Mail and campaigners have raised vital questions over how and why he came to die. Attorney General Dominic Grieve yesterday released a swathe of material in an attempt to answer the mysteries that refuse to go away. Here, Sue Reid examines his explanations.


Why was Lord Hutton's inquiry into Dr Kelly's death not a proper inquest? Why were witnesses never compelled to appear? Why were witnesses not put under oath?


Lord Hutton's approach was the same as a number of other public inquiries. Those witnesses he wished to give evidence all complied. He considered the quality of his investigation was not reduced by the fact evidence was not given under oath. Much of the crucial evidence was expert medical or scientific evidence.


Campaigners believe there is a lot of unreliable evidence from witnesses that hasn't been challenged. The ONLY way to end the conspiracy theories is to hold a proper inquest.

QUESTION: Coroners' rules stipulate that the time and place of a suspicious death must be recorded but this never happened at the Hutton inquiry. Why are these details still not known?

ANSWER: It is not accepted that there is any doubt over where Dr Kelly died or the cause of death. It is not possible to determine precisely the time of death.

ANALYSIS: It seems incredible that the most basic facts needed to discover the cause of any mysterious or sudden death have not been pinned down.

QUESTION: Dr Kelly was supposed to have died from slitting his left wrist and taking an overdose of painkillers. Hutton heard he had probably taken 29 co-proxamol pills because they were missing from a pack in his jacket. However, only a fragment of a pill was found in Dr Kelly's stomach.

ANSWER: The amount found in the blood was consistent with the ingestion of 29 tablets. Co-proxamol is implicated in 300-400 overdose deaths each year and in almost a fifth of drug-related suicides. The UK National Poisons Information Service says that the fatal dose of co-proxamol may be as little as 10-20 tablets.

ANALYSIS: It is stressed by doctors that Dr Kelly had little or no co-proxamol in his stomach and only the equivalent of two tablets in his blood.

QUESTION: Why was it assumed, rather than proved, that the pills he took came from a supply belonging to Dr Kelly's wife - rather than someone who wanted to kill him?

ANSWER: The brand markings on the packets found on Dr Kelly's body were the same as those prescribed to his wife and he knew where his wife kept her pills at home.

ANALYSIS: Investigators were unable to prove conclusively the batch recovered from his body were those belonging to his wife.

QUESTION: As Dr Kelly wore no gloves, why were no fingerprints found on the pack of pills, the knife with which he supposedly cut his wrist, his watch, his glasses or the mobile phone in his jacket pocket?

ANSWER: It is not unusual for fingerprints not to be retrieved from these types of articles.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Questions That Still Demand an Answer


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?