The Tie That Binds? A Case Study of Student Perceptions of Their Recreation-Related Majors

By Henderson, Karla A.; Patterson, Anthony "Tony" et al. | Schole: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education, Annual 2009 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Tie That Binds? A Case Study of Student Perceptions of Their Recreation-Related Majors

Henderson, Karla A., Patterson, Anthony "Tony", Palacios, Ines, Jeon, JungHwan "Jay", Peel, Judy, Cox, Ashley "Ac", Smith, Jordan W., Thompson, Timia, Schole: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education

Many college students begin their parks, recreation, tourism, therapeutic recreation, sports management, or outdoor recreation major (referred to hereafter as recreation-related major) with a narrow view of their academic path. These students usually have a specific career in mind such as becoming a park ranger, a recreation therapist, or an athletic director. The field of parks and recreation as defined 50 years ago has become more diversified today (Henderson, Bialeschki, Hemingway, Hodges, Kivel, & Sessoms, 2001), and many students appear to hold a narrow view regarding their specialty (Godbey, 2000). Although specializations seem to provide students with many opportunities, they also may dilute the coherence of a professional field.

The invited papers that appeared in the 2008 volume of Schole, for example, addressed one example of professional diversity regarding the role of sport management within traditional parks and recreation departments in higher education. Dustin and Schwab (2008) argued that sport management was an uncomfortable partner for academic parks and recreation departments. Among the points made, Dustin and Schwab argued that sports management can undermine park and recreation faculty members' professional purpose. The responses to Dustin and Schwab provided counterpoints about how sport management compliments traditional park and recreation academic departments (e.g., Gibson, 2008; Howard, 2008; McDonald, 2008; Wellman & Rea, 2008). This discussion sparked questions about the collective identity within recreation-related academic departments that often include a variety of specialized areas. Exploring further whether a collective identity exists may be useful.

Because curricula in universities have grown, we wondered how students enrolled in recreation-related specialties perceived their collective identity within a single department. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to use a case study at North Carolina State University to explore how undergraduate students perceived their recreation-related majors and the connections among specialty areas (i.e., recreation programming, tourism and commercial recreation, natural resource recreation, sport management) within the department. The results of this exploration may provide insights about the perceived identity and purpose that undergraduate students associate with the broad field of recreation. Bok (2006) argued that without a compelling unifying purpose in universities, "knowledge itself has splintered into a kaleidoscope of separate academic specialties with far too little effort to integrate the fragments, let alone show students how they might connect" (p. 2). If university communities have been indicted for this fragmentation, then exploring the integrated purpose or collective identity perceived by students in recreation-related majors within a department may be useful not only for educators but for the future of the profession.

Background Literature

As a frame for this study, we provide a short historical context about the evolution of parks and recreation curricula. In addition, we identify some of the contemporary issues facing higher education.

Historical Context

The formal acknowledgment of a field of practice related to parks and recreation began before the turn of the 20th century. For example, in the final years of the 19th century, tracts of land were set aside for purposes of preservation and use (e.g., New York's Central Park). The enactment of the Antiquities Act of 1906 resulted in a tool for the federal government to protect public land. The Playground Association of America also began in 1906 with the purpose of advocating for the value of play for children (Hartsoe, 2006). During this same time, voluntary organizations particularly focused on youth (e.g., Girl Scouts, YMCA) grew across the U.S. With these visible recreational programs and facilities, the need for coordination and the training of leaders became apparent (Sessoms, 1993).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Tie That Binds? A Case Study of Student Perceptions of Their Recreation-Related Majors


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?