Transforming the Classroom: Including Undergraduate Students in Program Evaluation

By Weddell, Melissa S.; Peden, John G. et al. | Schole: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education, Annual 2009 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Transforming the Classroom: Including Undergraduate Students in Program Evaluation

Weddell, Melissa S., Peden, John G., Wolfe, Brent D., Schole: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education


Student evaluations are used across university campuses as a measure of a teacher's ability to teach. Student standardized evaluations provide instructors with important feedback from the student's point-of-view and allow administrators to gauge the effectiveness of every teacher's instruction. The premise that student evaluations are reproducible and useful for evaluation has been accepted since the 1980s (Theall, Abrami, & Mets, 2001); however, there is a growing body of literature that examines the usefulness and validity of student evaluations. Critics of student evaluations often cite incorrect use of global questions, rating scales, and timeframe of administration as central problems for their usefulness. In an effort to improve the process, Davis (1995) suggests the creation of faculty-developed evaluation instruments suited to individual departmental curriculum and purpose (Divoky, 1995). Industry has adopted similar feedback methods which include "upward feedback" and the more popular 360-feedback assessment, where the fundamental premise is to gather information about organizations from multiple perspectives, specifically employees. The advantages of assessments like 360-feedback are widely recognized and offer several advantages over single-source assessment such as new perspectives with which to judge employees, reinforcement of organizational values and visions, and more comprehensive and objective data than one source (Fleener & Prince, 1997).

In summer 2008, faculty in the Recreation and Tourism Management (RTM) program at Georgia Southern University recognized a particular need in relation to evaluating overall student perceptions of the RTM program. While University supported course evaluations were in existence, an evaluation of the RTM program exploring issues related to curriculum, advisors, professional experiences, and internships did not exist. In an effort to improve the evaluation process and gain greater insight into student's perspective of the RTM program, a unique semester-long evaluation project was integrated into the Evaluation and Research course curriculum. The most unique factor of the project was the collaboration between faculty and students as they worked side-by-side to create a student exit-survey examining various aspects of the RTM program.

Description of the Activity

Students enrolled in RECR 4536--Evaluation and Research--learned survey techniques in a traditional classroom setting combined with a five phase group evaluation project. Students were placed in groups (6-8 students) to work on a semester long evaluation project that comprised 40% of their final grade. Each phase allowed the instructor to judge student progress, provide feedback, and assign points that accrued towards the final grade.

In this course, students were asked to assist the faculty and administration in improving the RTM program through their input and feedback. They were informed how important of a role their perspective would play in evaluating the program and improving it for future students. The introduction of this project as more of a charge for the students, rather than group work, excited the class and made them feel part of something that would make a difference in the future. Phase one included forming groups and developing a two page project proposal that included a title, abstract, names and contact information of group members, an introduction to the project, research questions, and potential impact of the project. This phase allowed students to become familiar with group members and ask important questions to clarify the purpose of the project.

The second phase required students to conduct a literature review and compile an annotated bibliography with ten sources (no more than three web-sites) in American Psychological Association (5th ed.) format. This phase of the project occurred in a computer lab and required students to search for literature as a class.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Transforming the Classroom: Including Undergraduate Students in Program Evaluation


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?