From Human Rights to the EU, the Tide's Turning against the Liberal Thought Police

Daily Mail (London), July 5, 2011 | Go to article overview

From Human Rights to the EU, the Tide's Turning against the Liberal Thought Police


Byline: by Melanie Phillips

MAY the tectonic plates of British politics be starting to shift just a fraction towards a state approximating reality?

The Home Office is shortly to publish a discussion paper about rethinking one section of human rights legislation.

This is Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which guarantees the 'right to family life'. Increasingly, it is being used by foreign criminals and illegal immigrants to dodge deportation by claiming they have the right to family life in the UK.

But other parts of human rights legislation cause just as much trouble - such as Article 3, which bans inhuman treatment and which has been similarly used to paralyse deportations of undesirables.

To bring to an end the grotesque carnival of injustice and erosion of Britain's security caused by human rights law, Britain would have to leave the ECHR altogether, or at the very least officially derogate from whole sections of the treaty. But the Government has so far been extremely reluctant to embark on either course, due to the likely political and legal repercussions.

Reluctant

Human rights law is not the only issue on which it has been reluctant to face up to hard choices and where the ground seems to be shifting rapidly.

Scarcely a day passes without some fresh and outrageous imposition upon Britain by the EU: a rise in its budget forcing Britain to cough up another [pounds sterling]1.4billion each year; threats to the hard-won British rebate; yet more invidious and crippling taxes.

And all this on top of the steady erosion of British selfgovernment by the unceasing tsunami of European laws, rules and regulations.

Such is the mayhem being caused by human rights law and the EU that something rather significant is happening to British political life. Views hitherto derided as extreme and beyond the pale are becoming mainstream.

Only recently Lady Hale, a justice of the Supreme Court usually associated with overwhelmingly 'progressive' views, warned that the increasingly pervasive use of Britain's Human Rights Act should be reined in.

She also suggested European human rights judges may have got it wrong by ruling that prisoners should have the right to vote. When an ultraliberal such as Lady Hale voices such sentiments, it's time to man the lifeboats.

Similarly, the view that Britby ain should leave the EU - once derided as the wittering of swivel-eyed British fanatics - is being voiced well beyond the usual suspects.

Reportedly, two of David Cameron's arch party 'modernisers', policy guru Steve Hilton and Policy Minister Oliver Letwin, say they think Britain should get out of the EU. And an ever-swelling number of Tory MPs appears to agree.

It is far too premature to say that the Prime Minister would even agree to derogating from the ECHR, let alone taking the far more explosive and separate step of leaving the EU.

Nevertheless, it is remarkable that, at the very least, it is becoming possible to have a debate about these propositions. For the terrible fact is that, until now, such a debate has been impossible because the Left-wing intelligentsia has ruthlessly shut it down.

This is true of a wide range of issues - such as immigration, multiculturalism, man-made global warming, equality and anti-discrimination laws, overseas aid and many more - on which only one viewpoint is permitted.

This has created a hidden iceberg of issues where the views of the people are not only ignored but scorned as extreme or bigoted - and those who express them are accordingly deemed to be beyond the pale. The results have been chilling. The equality agenda has deprived people with traditionalist religious views of the freedom to live according to their precepts. Worse still, adherents of the 'one view' agenda lose their ability to tell right from wrong and truth from lies - and so end up justifying their own wrongdoing as a moral act.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

From Human Rights to the EU, the Tide's Turning against the Liberal Thought Police
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.