Developments in Cases Arising under 28 U.S.C. (Section) 1581(a) during 2009

By Franklin, Aaron Edward | Georgetown Journal of International Law, Winter 2011 | Go to article overview

Developments in Cases Arising under 28 U.S.C. (Section) 1581(a) during 2009


Franklin, Aaron Edward, Georgetown Journal of International Law


TABLE OF CONTENTS

   I. INTRODUCTION
  II. CUSTOMS LAW BACKGROUND
 III. JURISDICTION
      A. Timely Protests
      B. Decision
      C. Denied Protest
      D. Imported Merchandise and Subject Matter
  IV. CIT PROCEDURES
      A. Millenium Lumber Distribution Ltd. v. United States
      B. ENI Technology Inc. v. United States
      C. Kahrs International, Inc. v. United States
 V. STATUTORY INTERPRETATION
      A. Mazak Corp. v. United States
      B. Kahrs International, Inc. v. United States
      C. Peerless Clothing International, Inc. v. United States
      D. International Custom Products, Inc. v. United States
      E. Drawback Procedures
         1. When Customs is Culpable for Untimely Filings.
         2. When a Drawback Entry is Complete
  VI. HTSUS INTERPRETATIONS
 VII. SKIDMORF DEFERENCE
VIII. APPRAISEMENT
IX. CONCLUSION

I. INTRODUCTION

This commentary reviews notable cases decided during 2009 that arose under [section] 201 of the Customs Courts Act of 1980, codified at 28 U.S.C. [section] 1581(a) ("[section] 1581(a)"). (1) This provision grants the United States Court of International Trade ("CIT"), "exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced to contest the denial of a protest, in whole or in part, under section 515 of the Tariff Act of 1930." These cases involve the CIT's judicial review of the denial of protests by the United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection ("Customs") regarding final decisions by Customs affecting how much importers pay in duties, fees, and exactions, in a given import transaction. (2) This commentary reviews cases decided by both the CIT and its appellate court, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("Federal Circuit").

Cases that arise under [section] 1581 (a) often lead to fact-intensive, tariff heading-specific, and merchandise-specific opinions that provide little guidance in cases involving other merchandise. This commentary, rather than repeating each case's facts, attempts to mine the 2009 cases for valuable indications of how the CIT and the Federal Circuit will resolve legal questions in the future. As such, not every case arising under this part of the court's jurisdiction was included. Rather, each case discussed answered some question that is likely to arise in other contexts.

This commentary proceeds in seven parts. It begins by explaining the legal infrastructure of customs law and how the CIT analyzes these cases. It then focuses on decisions resolving jurisdictional questions.

Next, it explores several cases that required interpretation of the court's rules of procedure. The following section discusses how the court construed statutory and regulatory provisions. After that, the next section discusses methods employed by the court to interpret the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States ("HTSUS"). The seventh section includes cases discussing the court's deference to Customs' decisions. The final section focuses on how the CIT decided its sole appraisement case.

II. CUSTOMS LAW BACKGROUND

This section provides a brief overview of how the import process goes from the port, to the CIT, all the way to the Federal Circuit.

When imported merchandise reaches a port of the United States, the importer of record must file paperwork declaring the merchandise's customs classification under the HTSUS, its duty rate, its value, and, in some cases, its country of origin. (3) This is known as entry of merchandise. The importer also has to provide a cash deposit to Customs to secure payment of all fees and charges due. (4)

Within six months of entry, Customs then finalizes the amount owed and potentially reviews any of the importer's declarations. This is known as liquidation of an entry. If Customs fails to act within six months, then the entry is "deemed liquidated" and the importer can be forced to pay no more than the cash deposit.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Developments in Cases Arising under 28 U.S.C. (Section) 1581(a) during 2009
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.